CubeAPM vs. GoCD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CubeAPM
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
CubeAPM is a full-stack observability platform built on OpenTelemetry that enables engineering teams to monitor services, infrastructure, logs, and metrics from a single pane of glass. Teams can self-host CubeAPM inside their own cloud or on-premises environment, or use it as a managed deployment. It delivers full-stack visibility with smart sampling, alerting, tracing, and unlimited data retention at a flat usage-based price of $0.15 per GB. Many teams face a trade-off in…
$0.15
per month per GB
GoCD
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
GoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A
Pricing
CubeAPMGoCD
Editions & Modules
Pro
$0.15
per month Per GB
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CubeAPMGoCD
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsCubeAPM follows a transparent & predictable usage-based pricing model starting at $0.15 per GB of data ingested per month. Unlike traditional APM tools that charge by host or agent, CubeAPM pricing scales linearly with data volume—no hidden fees, overages, or lock-ins. Teams can deploy self-hosted or managed versions with unlimited data retention and predictable monthly billing. Enterprise plans include ISO 27001-certified infrastructure, dedicated support, and volume-based discounts.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CubeAPMGoCD
Best Alternatives
CubeAPMGoCD
Small Businesses
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
NetBrain Technologies
NetBrain Technologies
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CubeAPMGoCD
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CubeAPMGoCD
Likelihood to Recommend
Lighthusky Technologies Pvt Ltd
most of the needs are covered.
Read full review
ThoughtWorks
Previously, our team used Jenkins. However, since it's a shared deployment resource we don't have admin access. We tried GoCD as it's open source and we really like. We set up our deployment pipeline to run whenever codes are merged to master, run the unit test and revert back if it doesn't pass. Once it's deployed to the staging environment, we can simply do 1-click to deploy the appropriate version to production. We use this to deploy to an on-prem server and also AWS. Some deployment pipelines use custom Powershell script for.Net application, some others use Bash script to execute the docker push and cloud formation template to build elastic beanstalk.
Read full review
Pros
Lighthusky Technologies Pvt Ltd
  • Alerting on set matrices
  • View graphs for needed matrices of our Application
  • with lower cost w.r.t the service we were using previously.
Read full review
ThoughtWorks
  • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
  • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
  • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
Read full review
Cons
Lighthusky Technologies Pvt Ltd
  • if posible more details on DB query, Like NR used to give details of even Index used for that slow query. This might make easy to solve slow DB query ( wrong-index issue)
Read full review
ThoughtWorks
  • UI can be improved
  • Location for settings can be re-arranged
  • API for setting up pipeline
Read full review
Usability
Lighthusky Technologies Pvt Ltd
We uses it.
Read full review
ThoughtWorks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Lighthusky Technologies Pvt Ltd
Satisfactory
Read full review
ThoughtWorks
GoCD is easier to setup, but harder to customize at runtime. There's no way to trigger a pipeline with custom parameters.
Jenkins is more flexible at runtime. You can define multiple user-provided parameters so when user needs to trigger a build, there's a form for him/her to input the parameters.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Lighthusky Technologies Pvt Ltd
  • Gave us the needed feature which we were using with lower cost
Read full review
ThoughtWorks
  • ROI has been good since it's open source
  • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
  • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
Read full review
ScreenShots

CubeAPM Screenshots

Screenshot of the CubeAPM Home pageScreenshot of an APM pageScreenshot of log managementScreenshot of the Real User Monitoring dashboardScreenshot of Infrastructure MonitoringScreenshot of Error Tracking