What users are saying about
8 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.5 out of 100
3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.2 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

D2iQ Mesosphere

Mesosphere is well suited for orchestrating workloads. It supports Docker as a container as well as support others. It is highly suitable for running resilient and auto recovering big data/application containers. Mesosphere has proven time and again to be production ready at a massive scale. It supports native single button/API call scale up and scale down and supports various deployment patterns like Blue-Green and others.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM Cloud Container Registry

Kube service hosted in IBM Cloud. We currently use IBM container registry only with this service
Lokesh Venkatesan | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

D2iQ Mesosphere

  • Deploying mesosphere and friends (e.g. marathon)
  • Deploying applications (e.g. Cassandra, Jenkins, Spark) on to mesosphere
  • Providing value add components such as velocity, and marathon-lb
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM Cloud Container Registry

  • Scalable Plans
  • Easily integrate it with IBM Kube service
  • Easy integration with IBM Cloud CI/CD tools.
Lokesh Venkatesan | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

D2iQ Mesosphere

  • Setting up is a bit of a hassle, especially ZooKeeper state management and mesos and marathon quorum.
  • Occasionally, I observed some failures when deploying something onto Marathon. Logging or detailed error reporting can help.
  • Stale containers and inconsistent states resultant of the cluster failure are hard to solve and need a complete system restart to get it back to normal state.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM Cloud Container Registry

  • It matches with what Docker Hub features. I think it is good, and doing what is intended.
Lokesh Venkatesan | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

D2iQ Mesosphere

I happen to like mesosphere because it integrates well with a Jenkins based workflow, Deis is a little more Heroku like and it's not clear how to fit that model into a continuous-integration process. Kubernetes has also been criticized for being complicated.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM Cloud Container Registry

Not Applicable in our case. We started using IBM container registry as IBM bluemix is our preferred cloud platform
Lokesh Venkatesan | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

D2iQ Mesosphere

  • I see mesosphere as having a positive impact overall on the industry trending Docker and containers in general.
  • Seeing how mesosphere helps and simplifies things for the developer and ops, it is definitely a game changer.
  • Native support of on demand scaling up and down as per the need is one of the best features.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM Cloud Container Registry

  • I'm working as a technical consultant for a canal barge company. I don't know completed information about the ROI.
Lokesh Venkatesan | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

D2iQ Mesosphere

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

IBM Cloud Container Registry

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Add comparison