D2iQ Mesosphere vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() D2iQ Mesosphere | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere) still supports the Mesosphere solution, which is designed for operations at a very large scale. It's powered by DC/OS, a production-proven cloud native platform that runs containers and data services on the same infrastructure. D2iQ rebranded to reflect their change and broadening of focus towards Kubernetes but other services such as Cassandra, Kafka, and Spark. D2iQ also now offers IT professional services in tandem with its products. | N/A |
Ansible | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it. | $5,000 per year |
| D2iQ Mesosphere | Ansible | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| D2iQ Mesosphere | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 99% Would buy again 265 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 210 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Happy with the feature set 263 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 166 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 89% Implementation went as expected 201 Answers | |
| D2iQ Mesosphere | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | Perforce Puppet Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 | Salt Score6.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| D2iQ Mesosphere | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.2 |
| Usability | - | 8.3 |
| Performance | - | 8.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.6 |
| D2iQ Mesosphere | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]()
|
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |




