Likelihood to Recommend Dataiku DSS is very well suited to handle large datasets and projects which requires a huge team to deliver results. This allows users to collaborate with each other while working on individual tasks. The workflow is easily streamlined and every action is backed up, allowing users to revert to specific tasks whenever required. While Dataiku DSS works seamlessly with all types of projects dealing with structured datasets, I haven't come across projects using Dataiku dealing with images/audio signals. But a workaround would be to store the images as vectors and perform the necessary tasks.
Read full review Most suited if in little time you wanted to build and train a model. Then, H2O makes life very simple. It has support with R, Python and Java, so no programming dependency is required to use it. It's very simple to use. If you want to modify or tweak your ML algorithm then H2O is not suitable. You can't develop a model from scratch.
Read full review Pros The intuitiveness of this tool is very good. Click or Code - If you are a coder, you can code. If you are a manager, you can wrangle with data with visuals The way you can control things, the set of APIs gives a lot of flexibility to a developer. Read full review Excellent analytical and prediction tool In the beginning, usage of H20 Flow in Web UI enables quick development and sharing of the analytical model Readily available algorithms, easy to use in your analytical projects Faster than Python scikit learn (in machine learning supervised learning area) It can be accessed (run) from Python, not only JAVA etc. Well documented and suitable for fast training or self studying In the beginning, one can use the clickable Flow interface (WEB UI) and later move to a Python console. There is then no need to click in H20 Flow It can be used as open source Read full review Cons Read full review Better documentation Improve the Visual presentations including charting etc Read full review Usability As I have described earlier, the intuitiveness of this tool makes it great as well as the variety of users that can use this tool. Also, the plugins available in their repository provide solutions to various data science problems.
Read full review Support Rating The support team is very helpful, and even when we discover the missing features, after providing enough rational reasons and requirements, they put into it their development pipeline for the future release.
Read full review The overall experience I have with H2O is really awesome, even with its cost effectiveness.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Strictly for Data Science operations,
Anaconda can be considered as a subset of Dataiku DSS. While
Anaconda supports Python and R programming languages, Dataiku also provides this facility, but also provides GUI to creates models with just a click of a button. This provides the flexibility to users who do not wish to alter the model hyperparameters in greater depths. Writing codes to extract meaningful data is time consuming compared to Dataiku's ability to perform feature engineering and data transformation through click of a button.
Read full review Both are open source (though H2O only up to some level). Both comprise of deep learning, but H2O is not focused directly on deep learning, while Tensor Flow has a "laser" focus on deep learning. H2O is also more focused on scalability. H2O should be looked at not as a competitor but rather a complementary tool. The use case is usually not only about the algorithms, but also about the data model and data logistics and accessibility. H2O is more accessible due to its UI. Also, both can be accessed from Python. The community around
TensorFlow seems larger than that of H2O.
Read full review Return on Investment Given its open source status, only cost is the learning curve, which is minimal compared to time savings for data exploration. Platform also ease tracking of data processing workflow, unlike Excel. Build-in data visualizations covers many use cases with minimal customization; time saver. Read full review Positive impact: saving in infrastructure expenses - compared to other bulky tools this costs a fraction Positive impact: ability to get quick fixes from H2O when problems arise - compared to waiting for several months/years for new releases from other vendors Positive impact: Access to H2O core team and able to get features that are needed for our business quickly added to the core H2O product Read full review ScreenShots