DBeaver vs. Terracotta

DBeaver

Terracotta

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
DBeaver	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	DBeaver offers comprehensive data management tools designed to help teams explore, process, and administrate SQL, NoSQL, and cloud data sources. DBeaver is available commercially as DBeaver PRO and for free as DBeaver Community.	$11 per month per user
Terracotta	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	Terracotta from German company Software AG presents a database management and development solution.	N/A

Pricing

DBeaver

Terracotta

Editions & Modules

Lite Edition Subscription: $11
per month per user
Enterprise Edition Subscription: $25
per month per user
Lite Edition License: $110
per year per user
Enterprise Edition License: $250
per year per user
Ultimate Edition License: $500
per year per user
CloudBeaver Enterprise: $1,000
per year per 5 users
DBeaver Team Edition: $1,280
per year per 1 administrator and 2 developers

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
DBeaver	Terracotta
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Discounts are available for multi-user licenses.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	DBeaver	Terracotta
Considered Both Products	DBeaver Verified User Anonymous Chose DBeaver It's perfectly similar. I like the look of the tool and the color designations, and that makes it preferable to hop into on a daily basis. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose DBeaver DBeaver is free and has clean UI Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose DBeaver Sequel Pro and Ace are much simpler but they have dangerous defaults such as writing updates without confirmation. Incentivized Helpful? Gustavo Du Mortier Database Designer Chose DBeaver SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) developers should take a look at DBeaver to see how a real management studio application should be. In DBeaver you can tell that the developers really think about the way DBAs and database developers use database management tools. With SSMS, … Incentivized Helpful? Jeremy Pierce, MBA Data Warehouse Engineer Chose DBeaver We found that sharing scripts and generating DDLs from Snowflake's IDE was a bit too much of a chore. Because of this, we began looking for alternate products. We found DBeaver, a free community tool, and tried it out. We've found that it is very intuitive and easy to use, I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose DBeaver DBeaver is more user-friendly than the other tools I have used. But security-wise, I don't trust it as much as other tools. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose DBeaver MySQL workbench from MySQL only supports MySQL databases and it only provides basic functionality. On top of that, the user experience could be quite confusing for first-time users. SSMS from SQL server doesn't support inline editing nicely. The view for inline editing and view … Incentivized Helpful? Aaron Smith Senior Software Developer Chose DBeaver dbForge Studio has a more intuitive UI for die-hard Windows users. It's also easier to use sorting and filtering in their grids. However, that one lacked the script generation and schema editing tools our development team needed to use on an almost daily basis. Valentina had the … Incentivized Helpful?	Terracotta geeta pillai Production Specialist Chose Terracotta It's great and efficient with data replication. Excellent with reducing cost on the consumption of asset. Efficient with data warehousing. Terrific with network Management. Incentivized Helpful? kumari kafalia Database Developer Chose Terracotta Super friendly and responsive customer service. Reliable and consistent with data management. Great with data visualization. Efficient with data replication. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

DBeaver

Terracotta

Database Development

Comparison of Database Development features of Product A and Product B
	DBeaver 7.3 Ratings 15% below category average	Terracotta 10.0 Ratings 16% above category average
Version control tools	6.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Test data generation	6.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Performance optimization tools	7.30 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Schema maintenance	8.40 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Database change management	9.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings

Database Administration

Comparison of Database Administration features of Product A and Product B
	DBeaver 5.5 Ratings 37% below category average	Terracotta 10.0 Ratings 22% above category average
User management	8.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Database security	5.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Database status reporting	4.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Change management	5.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	DBeaver	Terracotta
Small Businesses	Sequel Pro Score 9.5 out of 10	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Oracle Autonomous Database Score 8.5 out of 10	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises	Oracle Autonomous Database Score 8.5 out of 10	DBeaver Score 8.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	DBeaver	Terracotta
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	8.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	6.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	DBeaver	Terracotta
Likelihood to Recommend	Great tool for developers to use to dive into their databases. Not so great if you are a die-hard Windows user with expectations of a SQL Management studio replacement. This is the less suited tool for people looking to just view and edit data. If you need to generate any scripts or import and export data, this is the tool to use. Incentivized Aaron Smith Senior Software Developer Read full review	Terrific and wonderful with data consistency. Reliability and effectiveness with database recovery and backup. Efficient with license management. Incentivized kumari kafalia Database Developer Read full review
Pros	Identify types of DB connections by color code: development, testing and production. Predictive typing, it is incredibly accurate and saves me a lot of time. Jump between different simultaneous DB connections. Navigate through the schema object tree. Provide all the tools I need in one window. Gustavo Du Mortier Database Designer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Schema editing is not very intuitive. Editing a single column forces you into multiple tab windows when trying to change something simple like a column name. Sorting and filtering in data is nice, but buried in long right-click menus. Some things are definitely non-standard UI for a Windows application, so it might be hard for die-hard Windows fans to get used to. Incentivized Aaron Smith Senior Software Developer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	It's perfectly easy to use. Not super new and shiny with lots of accessibility tailored tools, but does the job Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Not a lot of users have DBeaver so fewer resources are available online to help you if you have any issues. When I was trying to figure out how to create my own ER diagrams, it was a little tough to find resources Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	We found that sharing scripts and generating DDLs from Snowflake's IDE was a bit too much of a chore. Because of this, we began looking for alternate products. We found DBeaver, a free community tool, and tried it out. We've found that it is very intuitive and easy to use, I would recommend it. Incentivized Jeremy Pierce, MBA Data Warehouse Engineer Read full review	It's great and efficient with data replication. Excellent with reducing cost on the consumption of asset. Efficient with data warehousing. Terrific with network Management. geeta pillai Production Specialist Read full review
Return on Investment	Positive Ability to manage DBeaver and query ad-hoc quickly By having the queries saved it has saved developer time and thereby increased the ROI on the investment on the tool This has made firefighting quicker and freed up resources for more development work. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots