LevelBlue DbProtect vs. Imperva Data Security vs. Oracle Audit Vault and Database Firewall

Monitoring database activity internally was a huge concern for my company, which is why we implemented DbProtect. I would recommend this to anyone that has lower end traffic on their SQL servers. My company appeared to be too big for DbProtect and was not a good fit, but it would be useful for a smaller company.

Incentivized

Compliance to audits and HiTrust certification. It is key in ensuring that our audits are completed in a timely manner with no repeats of data requests and that we also are HiTrust certified at our organization. Personally while the data obfuscation is available I am not sure I would fully trust that the data is completely sanitized if need be. It's not against the Imperva product but more of issue of data being used.

Incentivized

Any serious small or large business that is utilizing a mainstream database, purchase ordering system, and web platform should look into this software - especially if you're using softwares compliant with this protector. It really does do an outstanding job of addressing all weaknesses through auditing and vaulting the potential virus concerns.

Incentivized

• Easy to create filters.
• Interface was easy to use.
• Process to create filters as straight forward.

Incentivized

• Alerts when suspicious activity is detected
• Records all database transactions for analysis
• Determines activities in stored procedures

• Error messages are very understandable, providing you are in the loop.
• The more you [use] it, the more comfortable you feel with the product.
• It is logical.

Incentivized

• Speed of interface.
• The trace function utilized high resources at times and would sometimes crash servers.
• Support could have been better, but this is when the company was under Trustwave and even the owners before then.

Incentivized

• Navigation of the menus can get confusing pretty quickly. Since there are so many, it is extremely easy to get lost. Almost too many options and data.
• Configuring the agents can be very difficult if you are new to it. Having to save after every single change made to an agent during a configuration can be very tedious. Also having to make sure certain options are checked off in two separate places for a single option is very annoying.
• Navigation of the menus is not always intuitive and not very obvious that the option you are looking change is located in that menu.

Incentivized

• Ability to drive lower than metadata levels
• Cost issues with coverage to multiple targets

Incentivized

The price is the complete opposite and Imperva provided things that DbProtect did not. I would suggest a cleaner interface and more reporting in DbProtect. These things may exist now, but did not when I was a customer of DbProtect. DbProtect when configured correctly will do what you want it to and help secure databases.

Incentivized

We did not evaluate other alternatives since most of our related products are Oracle.

Incentivized

• Increase employee efficiency by putting all the information in front of us via alerts.
• Helped secure our database tables.
• I believe better customer service is needed for this product.

Incentivized

• Allowed us to meet important compliance requirements.
• When protecting critical data, we can see exactly how it's being used and by whom.
• Licensing costs are very reasonable.
• It takes a fair amount of administration to use properly.

• Systems Infrastructure Protection
• Multi-faceted Security for Complex Infrastructures
• Favorable Internal User Experience & Management

Incentivized