TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Dell PowerMax NVMe vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. SolidFire (discontinued)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Dell PowerMax NVMe

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/ADell PowerMax NVME is presented as a end-to-end NVMe, storage class memory (SCM) for persistent storage, real-time machine learning and up to 350GB per second to power critical workloads.N/A

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AHPE 3PAR StoreServ is a flash storage option, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.N/A

    SolidFire (discontinued)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ANetApp acquired the scale-out flash storage startup SolidFire in late 2015. The product line was discontinued in October of 2023, and is no longer available from NetApp.N/A
    Pricing
    Dell PowerMax NVMeHPE 3PAR StoreServSolidFire (discontinued)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Dell PowerMax NVMeHPE 3PAR StoreServSolidFire (discontinued)
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Dell PowerMax NVMeHPE 3PAR StoreServSolidFire (discontinued)
    Considered Multiple Products
    Dell Technologies
    No answer on this topic
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answer on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    Chose SolidFire (discontinued)
    • Solidfire is block-only, so NetApp FAS, HPE 3PAR, Tegile and Dell EMC Unity have the ability to also run file and block on the same array.
    • Performance scale in a single array of Solidfire is matched only with other software-defined architectures like EMC ScaleIO
    • Controller based …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Dell PowerMax NVMeHPE 3PAR StoreServSolidFire (discontinued)
    Enterprise Flash Array Storage
    Comparison of Enterprise Flash Array Storage features of Dell PowerMax NVMe and HPE 3PAR StoreServ and SolidFire (discontinued)
    Feature
    Dell PowerMax NVMe
    9.6
    2 Ratings
    8% above category average
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    -
    Ratings
    SolidFire (discontinued)
    8.1
    3 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Flash Array Performance10.02 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Flash Array Integration10.02 Ratings00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Data Compression10.02 Ratings00 Ratings8.83 Ratings
    Non-Intrusive Upgrades10.02 Ratings00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Simplicity8.72 Ratings00 Ratings6.43 Ratings
    Power Savings9.12 Ratings00 Ratings6.43 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Dell PowerMax NVMeHPE 3PAR StoreServSolidFire (discontinued)
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Dell Compellent (discontinued)
    Score8 out of 10
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Dell Compellent (discontinued)
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Everpure FlashArray
    Score8.2 out of 10
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Everpure FlashArray
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Dell PowerMax NVMeHPE 3PAR StoreServSolidFire (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.2
    (8 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.8
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Dell PowerMax NVMeHPE 3PAR StoreServSolidFire (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Dell Technologies
    PowerMax is suited for a mid-tier to enterprise company. It can easily take on and manage what it may take with various storage arrays. This can work in any vertical, healthcare, manufacturing, financial, insurance, etc. It can easily manage massive workloads and deliver very high-end performance. Is not feasible for small companies, this can and would be very expensive to maintain and operate, and it truly doesn't make sense when a much smaller array can be used.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a great storage device for both file and block-level storage needs. You can use it in place of SAN devices required by database servers. It provides an amazing compaction ratio and, hence, reduces overall storage footprint and cost. This is, however, slightly costly if your environment doesn't really see high transactions most of the time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Solidfire is a good, multi-purpose array for iSCSI environments. Grid architecture allows incremental, linear expansion of the array both in capacity and performance. The all-flash is a very high performance, low latency platform for a lot of applications. The way the company has architected the platform allows for continual upgrades and removes the lift-and-load replacements if you stay with Solidfire in the future. The Solidfire fiber channel implementation is workable, but largely there is a checkbox. I cannot imagine any fiber channel shop is going to look at a Solidfire seriously, unless they are looking to move towards Ethernet based transport. Write intensive workloads struggle on the array. The double-helix data protection combined with the architecture can make writes more latent than expected - well into the teens and 20's of ms within the array.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Dell Technologies
    • Fastest storage array in the world.
    • this system provide the performance density up to 7.5 million IOPS5 per rack
    • Its support maximum system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • We are using HP 3PAR storeServ 8200 for both our file level and block level storage.
    • I really love the amazing compaction ratio provided by HP 3PAR. Some of our disks have compaction ratio above 25:1, which is super amazing. You can definitely look for around 75% reduction of storage footprints.
    • It has a great user friendly web console "SSMC"(StoreServ Management Console). This is an additional bonus and can be used by even non-storage people like DBA and Network to take a look at storage performance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Speed is incredible.
    • Ongoing maintenance is great.
    • Price point was quite good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Dell Technologies
    • Can be complex if someone is not versed on the product.
    • Expensive.
    • High cost of maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • The system requires a physical or virtual system to manage upgrades and patches and for call home features. Most other systems have this integrated into the array. Just another piece of infrastructure to manage.
    • There are some system jobs that come pre-scheduled in the initial setup, but there is at least 1 job that should be added to this by default. When you delete storage, you also need to run a job to compact the CPG (a group where the luns all reside) to reclaim the previously used storage as free. This should be done by default at least monthly in the background.
    • There are 2 different GUI front ends that can still be used. The older version (3 PAR management console) is being phased out (has been for 3 years).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • API documentation could use some help
    • GUI can be slow
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Dell Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We are very satisfied with 3PAR performance and especially the IOPS (Input Output Per Second) is pretty amazing. It is easy to configure and doesn't require much knowledge of storage for Tier 1 support team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Dell Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    With their phone home technology, we usually have a replacement part on its way by the time we wake up in the morning, or if the event occurs overnight. We have had great support when we had questions or events that required a call.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    When we have had problems, the response on the Solidfire side has been strong, but not perfect. As they scale and integrate into NetApp, support from regions outside of the USA are having a more difficult time diagnosing and addressing issues for complex problems. The Boulder, CO, and Raleigh, NC, support teams are both extremely strong and provide top-notch support. ActiveIQ is a great support tool both for NetApp/Solidfire and for the customer. The proactive support tickets opened have been helpful. The node-based support has been excellent - meaning when we had a DIMM fail, they sent a replacement node - no time consuming troubleshooting of internal components to fix the issue. Upgrades are handled by SF technicians, so it feels white-glove
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Dell Technologies
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We still use NetApp storage enclosures at each plant for our routine file shares (CIFS) but I would love to swap them out for the HPE 3PARs as we use for our ERP app data. The 3PARS are simply faster and much better at near-instant replication. But even more importantly we can get the reporting that we need from the 3PAR within a few minutes, even custom reports. 3PARs are much easier to manage than NetApps in general and I think that the only place that they compete is in compaction.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    SolidFire was chosen over these other service providers because of relationships we have with the company, with our reps, and with the local Denver presence. We also are a partner, and we felt that the solution stacked up technologically very well against the competition and was more cost effective.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Dell Technologies
    • Cost
    • Opex vs Capex
    • Maintenance Costs.
    • Learning curve on software to maintain the array.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • We grew unexpectedly, which forced us to buy a lot of expensive HP SSD's.
    • We have never had any performance issues with this storage.
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • The ROI was quick - under 1 year
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots