DELMIAWorks (formerly EnterpriseIQ) is an industry specific ERP from IQMS, now a Dassault Systemes brand, developed for manufacturers in the aerospace, assembly, automotive, food, general manufacturing, medical devices, plastics, rubber, metal fabrication, packaging, stamping, and similar industries.
N/A
SSIS
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) is a data integration solution.
N/A
Pricing
DELMIAWorks
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DELMIAWorks
SSIS
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DELMIAWorks
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
Features
DELMIAWorks
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
2.2
3 Ratings
108% below category average
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
3.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
3.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
3.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
7.0
2 Ratings
6% below category average
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
10.0
7 Ratings
18% above category average
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
7.3
6 Ratings
0% below category average
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
-
Ratings
Dashboards
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
8.2
6 Ratings
7% above category average
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
8.5
8 Ratings
7% above category average
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
10.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
7.3
7 Ratings
7% below category average
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
-
Ratings
Pricing
5.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
7.0
56 Ratings
17% below category average
Connect to traditional data sources
00 Ratings
9.056 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL
00 Ratings
5.043 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
6.8
56 Ratings
17% below category average
Simple transformations
00 Ratings
9.056 Ratings
Complex transformations
00 Ratings
4.755 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
DELMIAWorks
-
Ratings
SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)
7.5
54 Ratings
4% below category average
Data model creation
00 Ratings
9.028 Ratings
Metadata management
00 Ratings
6.035 Ratings
Business rules and workflow
00 Ratings
7.045 Ratings
Collaboration
00 Ratings
9.040 Ratings
Testing and debugging
00 Ratings
6.351 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
As I mentioned earlier SQL Server Integration Services is suitable if you want to manage data from different applications. It really helps in fetching the data and generating reports. Its automation make it very easy and time efficient. It works well with large database as well. But it doesn't work well with real time data, it will take some time to gather the real time data. I would not recommend using it in a real time/fast-paced environment.
Accounting reports: accrued receipts reporting makes it difficult to reconcile.
Fixed assets: depreciation posts to the general ledger at the asset level, generating inordinately large numbers of relatively meaningless transactions.
Process cost: PIT display lacks many useful fields, including vendor name and number.
Financial reports carry beyond two decimal places.
Report structures are not sensibly arranged, and many reports imbed data within text fields, making manipulation and reporting more time-consuming.
Connection managers for online data sources can be tricky to configure.
Performance tuning is an art form and trialing different data flow task options can be cumbersome. SSIS can do a better job of providing performance data including historical for monitoring.
Mapping destination using OLE DB command is difficult as destination columns are unnamed.
Excel or flat file connections are limited by version and type.
Some features should be revised or improved, some tools (using it with Visual Studio) of the toolbox should be less schematic and somewhat more flexible. Using for example, the CSV data import is still very old-fashioned and if the data format changes it requires a bit of manual labor to accept the new data structure
The menu system is easy to navigate and intuitive for users. The learning curve for administrators is quite steep form setting up user permissions to creating reports for users. This is a very powerful system with many dynamics to help most companies. Expandability is always there and it comes down to how granular you would like your company to be on a data gathering/reporting and material flow process.
SSIS is a great tool for most ETL needs. It has the 90% (or more) use cases covered and even in many of the use cases where it is not ideal SSIS can be extended via a .NET language to do the job well in a supportable way for almost any performance workload.
SQL Server Integration Services performance is dependent directly upon the resources provided to the system. In our environment, we allocated 6 nodes of 4 CPUs, 64GB each, running in parallel. Unfortunately, we had to ramp-up to such a robust environment to get the performance to where we needed it. Most of the reports are completed in a reasonable timeframe. However, in the case of slow running reports, it is often difficult if not impossible to cancel the report without killing the report instance or stopping the service.
The support, when necessary, is excellent. But beyond that, it is very rarely necessary because the user community is so large, vibrant and knowledgable, a simple Google query or forum question can answer almost everything you want to know. You can also get prewritten script tasks with a variety of functionality that saves a lot of time.
It is nice that an IQMS employee helps you with the implementation, however they were more of a technical resource than a project management resource. I wish they could provide a more off the shelf timeline given their experience in implementing the system.
The implementation may be different in each case, it is important to properly analyze all the existing infrastructure to understand the kind of work needed, the type of software used and the compatibility between these, the features that you want to exploit, to understand what is possible and which ones require integration with third-party tools
This is the only software that I have used so I am unable to rate it based on another type of software. My experience with IQ is extensive though, and have worked and learned in all areas and love how this program works. The many different modules are relatively easy to learn and they offer support if you need additional instruction.
I think SQL Server Integration Services is better suited for on-premises data movement and ADF is more suited for the cloud. Though ADF has more connectors, SQL Server Integration Services is more robust and has better functionality just because it has been around much longer
Our implementation of warehouse management was probably the best investment our company has made recently. The control gained over our inventory is a tremendous asset and allows to see in an instant whether or not we can meet our customers' demands.
Without this, we would have to manually update a spreadsheet of our SQL Server inventory
We would also have poor alerting; if an instance was down we wouldn't know until it was reported by a user
We only have one other person who uses SQL Server Integration Services , he's the expert. It would fall to me without him and I would not enjoy being responsible for it.