Dendi LIS vs. NucleoLIS

- Patient portal allows us to send results directly to the patient, which is a must-have for laboratories going forward.
- Support is very responsive and helpful. You will always hear back from them in a timely fashion, often with a solution in hand.
- Very configurable. The system is well-designed, and most changes that need to be made can be done by the end-user.
- Product lifecycle is quick. We can request a complex feature update and have it be turned around in a matter of weeks.

NucleoLIS has the flexibility to build workflows for any type of clinical test. I experienced all of the positives that Psyche systems and NucleoLIS had to offer when I was tasked with building a workflow for COVID-19 testing. We were able to establish a LIMS workflow for COVID-19 testing in a matter of weeks in order to ramp up our testing to serve our community when we were one of the only testing sites available.

• Interfaces & connectivity
• Subject-matter expertise in clinical diagnostics industry
• Direct-to-consumer strategies
• User experience (UX)
• Communication & support

• No anatomic pathology
• QC functionality not fleshed out
• No built-in inventory tracking

• Software as flexible as NucleoLIS does require time to implement.
• I would like to see more out-of-the-box solutions for specimen workflows specific for the testing being offered.
• There isn't a billing option but it does allow data to be exported to be used by third-party billing software.

Not really a fair comparison, as one is an extremely old, modules-based system that is installed onsite, whereas the other is a modern, cloud-based solution that provides the entire gamut of functionalities in-house. The support structure is also different in that the support for portals is separated out from the main support for the software. That was not a great experience

I have used multiple LIMS systems in my career and have also developed internal systems for specific testing. NucleoLIS provides a great balance of developing a personalized system in a well-established and functional existing framework to build out each individual lab's workflows. This can be done without the need to have an entire IT department which I could not say for the previous systems I used.

• Undoubtedly positive impact.
• We can roll out new workflows and assays with confidence.
• Firmly part of our post-COVID strategy.