DevExpress Universal vs. DHTMLX

When you want to display spreadsheet based reports, it's really convenient as it has everything out of the box.

If you have very basic components like combo boxes or lists, there is hardly a point in using such a large component set.

In the end, it's a matter of finding a good balance between functionality and complexity.

Incentivized

Rapid development of web applications: DHTMLX provides a set of pre-built UI widgets that can be easily integrated into web applications, which makes it well suited for developing applications quickly. DHTMLX is well suited for building enterprise-level applications that require complex UI elements and data visualization. DHTMLX is less appropriate for Simple applications: If you are building a simple application that does not require a complex UI, DHTMLX may be overkill, and you may be better off using a lighter-weight framework.

Incentivized

• Handle large and complex datasets using its table widget (DataGrid)
• Handle large and complex hierarchical datasets using its tree table widget (TreeList)
• Customize widget to fulfill advanced requirements such as adding a complex grid inside a grid cell

Incentivized

• We got a response and fix for every issue we opened a ticket for
• The components are full with quite a lot of feature
• The team is responsiveness is very quick

• Documentation could be improved
• Better examples of code in languages other than C
• Better wizards for building applications

Incentivized

• There's always room to provide more samples to help

Incentivized

Feature rich but all requires programming as it's up to you to implement. However this does give full control and so your business logic can be implemented as you require.

Incentivized

DevExpress Universal controls are much simpler to use, implement and customized as compared to Kendo. Learning curve for telerik is high, though level of customization that can be achieved with telerik exceeds that of DevExpress Universal. Found DevExpress Universal community support to be better then its competitors. License cost is also a wining bar here.

Incentivized

We have tried few other options also which are not exactly tools and they are not listed here. The brief documentation along with the features samples makes DHTMLX better when compared with other options.

Incentivized

• It is good for asp.net application and it takes less time in development which we used two years back.
• We have stopped with these tools when clients were asking applications to be built in angular or react. We have switched to Kendo.

• Rapid development of web applications
• Rich data visualization tools, which makes it ideal for building data-driven applications
• Suited for building enterprise-level applications

Incentivized