DuckDB vs. Neo4j

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DuckDB
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
DuckDB is a free and open-source, in-process SQL OLAP database management system designed to support analytical query workloads. DuckDB contains a columnar-vectorized query execution engine, where queries are still interpreted, but a large batch of values (a “vector”) are processed in one operation.N/A
Neo4j
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Neo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.
$65
per month
Pricing
DuckDBNeo4j
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Aura Professional
$65
per month
Community Edition
Free
Enterprise Edition
Contact Sales
Aura Free
Free
Aura Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DuckDBNeo4j
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DuckDBNeo4j
Considered Both Products
DuckDB

No answer on this topic

Neo4j
Chose Neo4j
Neo4j's clean, feature-focused interface and native relationship handling eliminated the "recursive query tax" of postgres which was the real deal breaker. Postgres is great for standard relational data like our users' platform data, but Neo4j provided a great solution for …
Chose Neo4j
I have not used anything like Neo4J because of how unique it is in the work that it allows me to do. I am not aware of any other graph database platforms and it might be because it is a growing area (especially in the world of pharmaceuticals). I would be open to trying other …
Chose Neo4j
  • For easy query language and better graphical representation on small dataset
  • Also easy to set up and handle on the server.
  • On top of that Neo4j also provides an API support to interact through any system.
Chose Neo4j
Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join …
Chose Neo4j
Neo4j is ahead of any of the leading competitors I know. The only one which comes close, in my opinion, is the "Titan-Distributed Graph Database" which is completely open source and free to use. Titan works on top of Apache Cassandra so it has some huge learning curves to do, …
Chose Neo4j
We've done some BOE comparisons between Neo4j, Titan, and OrientDB. The general consensus was that Titan is too unweildy and that Neo4j beat out OrientDB by being more active and having a large community.
Best Alternatives
DuckDBNeo4j
Small Businesses
SQLite
SQLite
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SQLite
SQLite
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SQLite
SQLite
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DuckDBNeo4j
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DuckDBNeo4j
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Its very well suited for storing graph types relationship information, such as a group of people and their relationships. Data modeling this sort of information in a traditional SQL database is a pain and inefficient. Using Neo4J allows for efficient modeling of data while providing rich querying capabilities using Cypher. Its also a great fit for any programming language because of its support for REST API. It's less appropriate for any other data structure other than Graph data. So as with any DB, evaluate the data structure and query and if the querying revolves around relationships, then Neo4J is a fit. If there is more need for looking up individual nodes and their associated information, Neo4J might not be the most efficient solution in the market.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • When joins are a common in a relational store, switching to Neo4j is better
  • When pattern matching and surfacing interesting insights is the goal, neo4j's cypher is pretty powerful
  • When schema is not completely known beforehand and needs to be evolved with time
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • We felt we could only scale easily vertically
  • We felt limited by Neo4j's hosted machine options
  • Limited constraints to enforce relational patterns
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Learning cypher was super easy coming from a SQL background. Furthermore, the docs Neo4j provides on their website make it really easy to pull up a reference, guide or a quick example. The mac app they provide is also really well designed with good visualisation tools, with the ability to easily use colour, line thickness etc to help navigate your data.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I have not used anything like Neo4J because of how unique it is in the work that it allows me to do. I am not aware of any other graph database platforms and it might be because it is a growing area (especially in the world of pharmaceuticals). I would be open to trying other softwares though.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • For experimentation purposes, it had a positive impact on my company. It was very natural to work with Neo4j and so intuitive to visualize the data.
  • Neo4j community edition is free, which is what we experimented on. So there was no investment up front apart from employee's time. But this quickly gave results and it was time well spent.
  • Neo4j is a cool but very new technology. It was hard to have people onboard, especially some of the leadership and relational folks.
Read full review
ScreenShots