Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com) vs. Textmetrics

As a former writer, the tools that DupliChecker offers are of a great deal. They are vital and useful for my day-to-day work. I always see to it that my work is free from plagiarism and it does not infringe upon other people’s works. It also helps me deliver my words in a clear and concise manner.

Incentivized

I honestly can't think of a scenario where WebTextTool (TextMetrics) would not be valuable for anyone writing content intended for publishing either online or in print media. If the intent is for print media, then even if you completely ignore the SEO section of the analysis, all of the other analysis tools intended for content are incredibly insightful and helpful. These days, even print media almost always ends up online in some form or another on the publisher's website or in a digital format of the publication. So the SEO tools can still give a little boost in reworking or rewording some parts to make sure they will be effective not only in print but online as well.

Incentivized

• Has the ability to write with more than 20 thousand words.
• It offers you security when sharing your file, since there is no way to copy it.
• Offer free services.
• Your mistakes will no longer be a problem when writing, since it corrects them immediately.
• 1- Allows scanning

Incentivized

• Tracks the exact page ranking
• Optimizes SEO on-page in detail and with a number of measures, including a readability metric.
• Tracking website content with a website ranking system

Incentivized

• Its algorithms are designed for the best performance of the data used as a user.
• We can get results quickly effectively as it leads us to dependencies of its functions while investigating each keyword.

Incentivized

• WebTextTool (TextMetrics) assumes that each uploaded or typed in the article is intended for online publishing, mostly in a blog type environment. While this is a perfectly understandable assumption in this day and age, it shouldn't be so difficult to ask the question of whether the content is intended for online or print media.
• The "Credibility" section tends to be a little too harsh for my taste. Depending on the style of writing and the type of content, "too many adjectives" is too subjective a metric to apply to all writing ( still, I do get why they try to do it).
• This is a little nitpicky, but I'd prefer to see how many projects and credits I have left to use on the dashboard page as opposed to having to click over to my account. A dashboard should show everything that a user needs to see in one shot.

Incentivized

I only had to reach out to TexMetrics once when initially getting my account setup after signing up. The response was swift, and they addressed my question completely. I've had no other issues since I began using TextMetrics, so based on that one interaction, I have to give them a great score. I assume that it is still the same as when I reached out that one time (at least I hope it is!).

Incentivized

Sharethrough has limitation is a boon as well as a detriment since it is both offering niche inventory that can perform while also limiting itself to be within only one category of the digital inventory space. On the other hand, Dupli Checker provides better functionality for its users which helps us in various ways.

WebTextTool plugin works like a charm, but it should better integrate with Yoast, as it would create a huge benefit.

Incentivized

• Although a paid version is needed to convert more than 20,000 words, this platform is worth paying for, because it helps you create authentic text without grammatical errors.
• Helps our organization to avoid that any important document that has to be shared with another organization, contains plagiarism.
• The best of all is that it has first-rate technology and excellent security.
• It has an impressive color-coding scheme, so you can identify which are the duplicates and the unique ones.

Incentivized

• My organic traffic has improved 11% every month

Incentivized