Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
EaseUS Todo Backup
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
EaseUS Todo Backup is a data backup and partitioning tool. Users are able to automate hard drive cloning for backup and disaster recovery.N/A
Macrium Reflect
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Macrium Reflect is an endpoint and server backup and cloning solution from Macrium Software (aka Paramount Software UK), available in personal and professional editions.N/A
Microsoft System Center
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft System Center is an enterprise-grade IT Operations Management (ITOM) suite designed for the centralized administration of data center infrastructure, virtualized environments, and hybrid cloud workloads. The platform provides unified management across heterogeneous environments, including support for Windows Server, Linux, and Azure Stack HCI. System Center is Microsoft's ITOM stack for organizations that maintain a significant on-premise footprint, vs the company's Azure-based…
$1,323
Pricing
EaseUS Todo BackupMacrium ReflectMicrosoft System Center
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Standard Edition
$1323
Datacenter Edition
$3607
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EaseUS Todo BackupMacrium ReflectMicrosoft System Center
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EaseUS Todo BackupMacrium ReflectMicrosoft System Center
Considered Multiple Products
EaseUS Todo Backup
Chose EaseUS Todo Backup
EaseUs Todo Backup is well suited for the small business environment and provides a good bang for the buck and value for features. It is not as costly as the other enterprise-grade solutions and therefore fits well into the budget of small businesses. It is not as advanced as …
Chose EaseUS Todo Backup
EaseUs Todo Backup is an excellent product, on par with most other backup solutions. I actually use both EaseUs Todo Backup and IDrive, as a secondary backup system. IDrive stores my data in the cloud, so I have complete and up-to-date backups both locally and on the cloud. …
Chose EaseUS Todo Backup
The ease of use and the price point are the main factors for my business and customers. I/they don't want to spend a lot of time worrying about and setting up backup software when they have more important things to attend to.
Macrium Reflect
Chose Macrium Reflect
I am with Macrium Reflect for many years and even don’t remember what I prior to this program.
Chose Macrium Reflect
Previously, I used Acronis as my company purchased licensing for years. It's great, but I found Macrium Reflect more straightforward, and the free version has been perfect for personal use.
Chose Macrium Reflect
Veeam offers Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows, a product we also install and use. It compares favorably with Macrium Reflect; however, for small firms and individual wanting an added cloud backup of their full hard drive, Macrium wins out in requiring less cloud storage space …
Chose Macrium Reflect
We used IBM and Freesync, but all other software had file differences. Architecture kind of backups take a long time for our 10tb storage. We compared times and it's x5 faster because Macrium is a block-based backup system instead of file comparison, and won't affect …
Microsoft System Center
Chose Microsoft System Center
SCCM is often considered superior to Intune because it is more predictable and transparent in day-to-day operations. Errors in SCCM are clearer and easier to troubleshoot, whereas Intune issues can feel vague and harder to diagnose. SCCM also offers rich, built-in features such …
Chose Microsoft System Center
Microsoft System Center really integrated with our windows system better than any other 3rd party product which obviously you would expect to a certain extent. Our main reason to procuring System Center (apart form the options)was licensing costs. We already had a Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft System Center
It has more intuitive features and business ready monitoring capabilities
Chose Microsoft System Center
None. We are a Microsoft business, and this is THE tool for imaging, packaging, remote support, and antivirus management. Microsoft's tool is the best for managing its software, systems, and antivirus clients. I will say that Microsoft Intune, the cloud platform, can be used …
Chose Microsoft System Center
The capability of SCOM as far as monitoring Windows systems is concerned is far greater than any monitoring product out there as both are a Microsoft product so integration and discoveries work well and fast.
Chose Microsoft System Center
Veeam Backup & Replication
Chose Microsoft System Center
The versatility of the suite of application provided by the Microsoft experience center was way above the other competitors , it helped gained leverage over the other products in the market . That why we made the decision of choosing Microsoft system center as a infrastructure …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We use Azure, we have lisences, so we have no needs any other cost.
And also, we want to save backup data in Azure.
Veritas ask additional cost reagurally and have to rebuild bakcup environment.
Chose Microsoft System Center
Because Datadog was too small, we decided quickly to use Microsoft System Center. We use a lot of other Microsoft products so that discussion was quickly set internally.
Chose Microsoft System Center
We have used Ghost from Symantec (licensed), FOG and Clonezilla which are freeware products. All three products had their pros and cons. The two freeware products were functional but did lack some polish, and Ghost was a good product for imaging of desktop computers. All did …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We previously used a mix of FOG and Clonezilla to image machines. The biggest issues with these products is that changing one piece of the image required you to rebuild the entire image itself. These pieces of software also did not allow you to manage applications and Windows …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We are using Microsoft products for a long time, so the overall confidence played a part in the decision, the feature set and licensing cost was also very high when compared with above products, so we decided to use System Center for our environment, so far it has solved many …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We selected it simply because it is less expensive than the competition, but yet just as good. We saw no reason to go outside the walls of Microsoft for this task. We are satisfied with the product.
Chose Microsoft System Center
This was used to monitor uor non-Windows systems and was cumbersome. Their licensing was per device with how many agents you needed; however, with System Center Operations Manager, their billing was a lot easier for their product.
Chose Microsoft System Center
All comparative features are way expensive and complex to configure in all other competitors. Value to money and ease of deployment for Microsoft based environment
Chose Microsoft System Center
Microsoft System Center has more options. Microsoft System Center has the ability to image PCs as well as remotely connect to PCs, and software installation and patching where Symantec Ghost Solution Suite didn't handle all of these options as well. We haven't looked at many …
Chose Microsoft System Center
Much better UI for system center. Also, Tivoli was discontinued, so it was an easy decision. Altiris was acquired by Symantec but was unreliable and painful. It's UI was unresponsive and generally outdated. It wouldn't clean up old packages and would hog GB of disk space, …
Chose Microsoft System Center
SCOM is better than OMi for Windows-based servers monitoring.
You need to know how to use Visual Studio to customize the management pack.
Dynatrace is way better for all Application Performance Manager.
Chose Microsoft System Center
It has its similarities between the two from a ticketing standpoint but as a primarily Microsoft shop it is nice to have a product that was created to play along with other tools that we are using such as SCCM. We like Jira for the project management tools and Cherwell for …
Chose Microsoft System Center
It is an excellent product for monitoring features like Exchange, Active Directory, DNS. Monitors are custom designed and can be adjusted to any system. Great monitors can be created even when monitoring open-source systems.
Chose Microsoft System Center
It is used to monitor network device health status, similar to SCOM. Microsoft SCOM is far superior, however.
Chose Microsoft System Center
This is our first solution and we have been using it for many years.
Chose Microsoft System Center
How SCEP stacks up against some of the other AV solutions/products is that it does a pretty good job overall (not the best in the industry) at detecting/removing malware, which is the main focus for a product like this. It is also easy to use on the end-user side, which can't …
Features
EaseUS Todo BackupMacrium ReflectMicrosoft System Center
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
EaseUS Todo Backup
-
Ratings
Macrium Reflect
8.6
Ratings
0% above category average
Microsoft System Center
-
Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
EaseUS Todo Backup
-
Ratings
Macrium Reflect
8.8
Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft System Center
-
Ratings
Continuous data protection00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Replication00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
EaseUS Todo BackupMacrium ReflectMicrosoft System Center
Small Businesses
Macrium Reflect
Macrium Reflect
Score 9.3 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Acronis True Image
Acronis True Image
Score 8.5 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EaseUS Todo BackupMacrium ReflectMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EaseUS Todo BackupMacrium ReflectMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
It works really well in residential and small business settings. The price point is perfect for the peace of mind it gives. I honestly don't see a situation where it wouldn't be worth the investment.
Read full review
Macrium Reflect creates synthetic full images for fast recovery in case of disaster. It also works pretty well on creating SQL server database backups. It can send a report of taken backups and failures to get users' attention if backups are being taken. It has a good management interface called Macrium Site Manager that connects to installed agents on different servers and has 1 site management configuration for all site servers.
Read full review
We used a product before that was designed to prevent users making changes and saving files to the desktop computer. This required a renewal of the license. By using SCCM in our environment we were able to discontinue using that product because SCCM allows us to completely restore a machine back to the original configuration. We have taught our users to save their individual work on either a network drive or a cloud drive. By doing this, if we do a re-image of their machine they have lost no data, and it makes for a faster resolution. In some instances having a computer in our SCCM environment it can become cumbersome when creating new users for very specific purposes. It can be done by creating new organizational units and applying new policies but when in a pinch it can be frustrating. For the most part we have tried to make "new" purpose images and groups to at least accommodate a quick install.
Read full review
Pros
  • The GUI is simple yet robust.
  • It does the job smoothly in the background.
  • It is easy to use for all skill levels.
Read full review
  • Image drives/disks/volumes.
  • Provide incremental backups through imaging.
  • Provide mountable disk or volume images.
Read full review
  • Allows us to visualize our systems in a single interface and see the status of health as well as relevant performance metrics.
  • A flexible and powerful interface with active alerting covering domain controllers, SQL servers, etc...
  • Allows you to customize your views and workspaces for specific tasks and needs.
  • Reporting is powerful and flexible.
Read full review
Cons
  • The alerts and could be more detailed which will make troubleshooting easier.
  • The backup schedules could include more options for repeats, misses, and backup windows.
  • More support for virtual environment features.
Read full review
  • Capability to create an image file to restore directly to a cloud computer
  • Use a different default naming pattern for backup files
  • Support for Linux
Read full review
  • One of the biggest drawbacks to SCOM is the sheer scope and complexity of the system. This can be a pro and a con. The system is very customizable, what you put into it is what you'll get out of it. That said, the learning curve is fairly steep. An organization needs to be committed to putting time and resources into SCOM to get the most out of it. I've heard stories from colleagues of several different companies that invested in SCOM and then abandoned it due to the excessive time and care required.
  • SCOM is expensive. Not only is the enterprise licensing costly, SCOM requires it's own servers, operational and warehouse databases to be maintained.
  • The OOB SCOM reports are a bit clunky and feel outdated.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
EaseUS Todo Backup is a superb software that does what it claims without the user needing a degree in computer science. Its plain user interface belies a lot of functionality that logically "guides" the user to making local and remote (cloud) backups of their important data. Additionally, the secure encryption of backups is just one less thing to worry about.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager is tightly integrated to Microsoft Windows servers os monitoring with great product support.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
There is a small learning curve in the beginning, but altogether a great tool for my purpose.
Read full review
It is not user-friendly for the most part. With IT infrastructure, sometimes it cannot handle excess requests. Every few months, you will need an upgrade in terms of server resources to keep up with incoming alerts and requests. This does not happen all of the time, but it does happen when there are too many requests.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We have not been opening tickets for support from Macrium at the moment, only for licencing issues, but good attention and fast response by the support team. They respond pretty fast to our emails and fixed our issues giving us a good explanation of our case without any complications. Due to the good functionality of the software we have not opened a ticket for support in years.
Read full review
There is a fair amount of documentation out there to help you when you have questions or run into issues with this product as well as tutorials on some of the more common tasks. Between the documentation and the overall ease of use we haven't had to deal with direct Microsoft support for this product.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Easy to install with intuitive interactive interface during the installation process a and integration to MS SQL was smooth
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
EaseUs Todo Backup is well suited for the small business environment and provides a good bang for the buck and value for features. It is not as costly as the other enterprise-grade solutions and therefore fits well into the budget of small businesses. It is not as advanced as the enterprise solution, but it provides the right mix of features and functionality to meet the needs of the average small business network.
Read full review
Veeam offers Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows, a product we also install and use. It compares favorably with Macrium Reflect; however, for small firms and individual wanting an added cloud backup of their full hard drive, Macrium wins out in requiring less cloud storage space by a significant margin. ShadowProtect is a rock solid competitor with a higher price and no free version. It is highly dependable, but more complicated to install and set up. The number of technical issues and quality of technical support have ruled out Acronis products. MSP360 Backup has impressive technology, but we encountered issues with restore times and full drive image restores.
Read full review
None. We are a Microsoft business, and this is THE tool for imaging, packaging, remote support, and antivirus management. Microsoft's tool is the best for managing its software, systems, and antivirus clients. I will say that Microsoft Intune, the cloud platform, can be used for those with heavy 365 usage, but for us, that does not meet our current company needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Provides good value for money in the price to feature ration.
  • Provides a high ROI for small businesses that do not necessarily need to spend on an enterprise-grade solution.
  • Provides a quick and easy option that is yet reliable and easy to use as a Disaster Recovery contingency for small businesses.
Read full review
  • Impossible to specify.
Read full review
  • The positive impact it has had on ROI is that it has been a solid AV product in our environment, meaning it has worked well when running on client computers. It doesn't use a lot of system resources on the client-side, so that helps end-users productivity of not being slowed down.
  • It has been good for the end-user, since they really don't need to take additional training or consult user manuals, in how to use the product.
Read full review
ScreenShots