Enghouse Vidyo vs. FigJam

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Enghouse Vidyo
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
From Enghouse Systems, Vidyo is a web conferencing platform that features video calling and instant chat capabilities. The platform integrates with most environments, networks, and devices.N/A
FigJam
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.
$5
per month per editor
Pricing
Enghouse VidyoFigJam
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
FigJam Professional
$36
per year per editor
FigJam Organization
$60
per year per editor
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Enghouse VidyoFigJam
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Enghouse VidyoFigJam
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
9.8
9 Ratings
20% above category average
FigJam
-
Ratings
High quality audio9.89 Ratings00 Ratings
High quality video9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements9.77 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
7.8
9 Ratings
2% below category average
FigJam
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing7.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Whiteboards7.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
7.8
9 Ratings
6% below category average
FigJam
-
Ratings
Calendar integration9.67 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting initiation9.69 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with social media5.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Record meetings / events5.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Slideshows9.78 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
6.9
8 Ratings
17% below category average
FigJam
-
Ratings
Live chat9.68 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience polling5.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Q&A6.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Enghouse Vidyo
8.9
8 Ratings
9% above category average
FigJam
-
Ratings
User authentication9.88 Ratings00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions9.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Enghouse VidyoFigJam
Small Businesses
ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting
Score 9.3 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting
Score 9.3 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
Miro
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Enghouse VidyoFigJam
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(9 ratings)
6.7
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Enghouse VidyoFigJam
Likelihood to Recommend
Enghouse
I've had HR professionals ask about using it for interviews. Gone are the days where we have to spend hundreds of dollars to fly candidates in or limit ourselves to phone interviews. Vidyo with it's high reliability has saved the organization thousands in travel costs with candidate recruitment. Business meetings that can often be troubling to get leaders and executive all in one room, Vidyo has functioned extraordinarily well in bringing in people from home, on the road, or the airport. Mobile capabilities are easy and fast. Quick daily calls and chats in the office are probably best suited for the free options out there as Vidyo is not a free service like others. Better yet general phone calls will suffice.
Read full review
Figma
It is well suited when people use it to sketch the first wireframes of the UX, like the Breadboarding technique from Basecamp. I used to work like that when modifying some UX. Our designers used to sketch over our current experience wireframe, and then we could discuss it by using the comments in Figjam or the Call feature at FigJam. That made it easy to discuss it. When building up group boards to discuss ideas, I use Miro, once it has more native pre-sets that help conducts the discussion.
Read full review
Pros
Enghouse
  • I didn't have to sign up, I just need to log into the "room" I was supposed to, so unlike Skype or other instruments, I didn't need to spend time and create my own account.
  • To be honest, the largest online class I've attended had 10 people in it (besides the teacher), but it was a good quality connection.
  • I enjoyed the ability to ask questions or clarifications in the chat (without having to turn on my microphone, so that the teacher could answer the question when he/she finished the thought).
Read full review
Figma
  • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
  • Easy to preview
  • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
Read full review
Cons
Enghouse
  • The design and the branding give little to be desired
  • Customer support is below average
  • The API must be rewritten and add more functions that are commonly requested.
  • Project codes are not well maintained and hard to find.
Read full review
Figma
  • Less Rigidity
  • Ability to work with Different Documents
  • A light version of Figma
Read full review
Usability
Enghouse
Though not as widely used as Zoom or Google Hangouts, it is very competitive as far as features and usability
Read full review
Figma
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Enghouse
We have an internal tech team dedicated to setup and troubleshooting of Vidyo. This makes it very easy, because we have access to our own employees for help. Rarely have I or anyone I work with had to escalate something to Vidyo themselves, and we're lucky to have the internal administrators that run the show. Almost like Vidyo is ours and ours alone.
Read full review
Figma
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Enghouse
Vidyo gives all of the competitors a run for their money. Since it works seamlessly, is easy to use, and has a clean UI. Screenshare could benefit from some work, like the ability to share multiple screens from different users at the same time. The search function could be improved, but overall, it's a great software.
Read full review
Figma
Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has more pre-set diagrams than FigJam and they are native and easy to use FigJam is paid, while draw.io is not.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Enghouse
  • It did help us reach the objective of education - after a while, everyone had a chance to connect and the quality of video/audio once you're in is great. It's just getting there that isn't up to par (but hopefully would be changed in next versions).
Read full review
Figma
  • I believe that creating professional projects inside a web app feels amateurish.
Read full review
ScreenShots