Engine Yard vs. MongoDB
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Engine Yard | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Engine Yard is a platform-as-a-service solution allowing developers to plan, build, deploy, and manage applications in the cloud. Engine Yard also provides services for deployment, managing AWS, supporting databases, and microservices & container development. | $800 Per Month Per Cluster |
MongoDB | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | MongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster. | $0.10 million reads |
| Engine Yard | MongoDB | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Fully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Engine Yard | MongoDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| Engine Yard | MongoDB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoSQL Databases |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Engine Yard | MongoDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Engine Yard | MongoDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Availability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.4 |
| Engine Yard | MongoDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | MongoDB Screenshots |














