(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter vs. F5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco CloudCenter (formerly CliQr CloudCenter) was an application-defined cloud management platform for deploying and administration of applications across datacenters, private, and public cloud resources. It has been discontinued by Cisco, and is no longer available for sale.N/A
F5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
F5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect is a solution used to more easily and securely network across public clouds, hybrid clouds, and edge sites via an agile SaaS-based service. Users can rapidly connect instances deployed across multiple cloud regions and/or different cloud providers using Distributed Cloud Network Connect and its automated provisioning, integrated service stack, and end-to-end visibility. Cloud instances will be connected in minutes and always visible for rapid troubleshooting.N/A
Pricing
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterF5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterF5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterF5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterF5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
-
Ratings
F5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
7.0
14 Ratings
21% below category average
Cloud Management Security00 Ratings7.212 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration00 Ratings6.88 Ratings
Cost Management00 Ratings6.88 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring00 Ratings7.311 Ratings
Governance and Compliance00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.111 Ratings
Systems Integration00 Ratings6.712 Ratings
Best Alternatives
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterF5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.7 out of 10
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterF5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.5
(14 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(14 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(9 ratings)
User Testimonials
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterF5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
It is well suited for large corporate entities, whether they are in manufacturing, sales, engineering, healthcare, supply or shipping. It is easy to understand and operate once it has been initially configured. Expansion of the system is likewise easy to do once expertise has been acquired. The only difficulty with this or any cloud scenario is ensuring where the data is located and managing that securely.
Read full review
F5
F5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect Would be incredibly useful when having to juggle multiple cloud providers. Also XC would be fantastic for standardization and consistency of the whole networking stack. It may be less useful for incredibly specialized cases where very specific traffic manipulation is needed. Any use-cases with heavy APM usage would have to be carefully considered as those features didn’t make it into XC yet.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • We are able to automate deployment which has been a strength to the geographical distribution of the enterprise.
  • We have been able to work with a wider variety of developer tools and haven't had to customize to fit CloudCenter.
  • It is easier for us to allocate space and allow users to take advantage of the system directly with a minimum of overhead.
Read full review
F5
  • Centralized Hybrid ingress for our cloud workloads
  • Centralized ingress for our existing on-prem BIG-IP devices
  • Application visibility to address end-to-end visibility into the end-user experience
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • The software and systems don't present a problem to us but the continued interaction with mid-level support teams and vendors can slow down implementation or correction of difficulties we experience.
  • The continued overhead associated with peripheral training on systems we have purchased can cause delays.
  • Language barriers sometimes show up but this, again, is due to remote middle agents that are themselves contractors of or sales agents of the main agency. It slows down communication and can introduce business difficulties.
Read full review
F5
  • The support model needs a quite a bit of work. I personally have experienced an outage on the platform. due to mis-configureation Although the outage was due to engineer error it took over 2 hours before we were able to speak to an engineer
  • Proxy v2 protocol to allow our organization to capture and view the source IP address
Read full review
Performance
Cisco
No answers on this topic
F5
Overall, F5 Distributed Cloud Network Connect is responsive and has many features. There is minor clunkiness in how certain scroll bars are layered. This may cause some adverse experience when trying to manage this product through a zoomed browser. Page loading and refresh timers were all very much responsive. There is a good amount of feedback from the interface as well.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We found that the cost advantages were greater by going with Cisco because of our present contracts and the materials and equipment we already had on hand. The reliability of the system, for us, outweighed any cost advantages we might have been realized by going with another provider. Certainly the service and support for the entire system is much better when handled by a single vendor with a good track record.
Read full review
F5
Aviatrix operates like a slightly different version of XC. Mostly it relies on routing, where cloud connect takes a whole stack into consideration. Not sure if XC can fully replace Aviatrix, but after a couple of implementations, it may become apparent. There are similar routing features in both. XC has more overall features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • We have had a positive return on investment by adopting Cisco CloudCenter as the system is more mature than competitors. We have saved a lot by working with them rather than continuing to act as a defacto test location for other systems.
  • We have been able to reduce the number of staff necessary to operate the system and turn them over to more profitable work.
  • One negative impact we have seen is that it is difficult to map where the data is located at any specific instance.
Read full review
F5
  • Is a niche segment and it provides a rich set of features that supports our use case
Read full review
ScreenShots