Epicor BisTrack vs. IFS Applications

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor BisTrack
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Epicor BisTrack is business management software for lumber and building materials (LBM) dealers and distributors based on technology acquired with SolarSoft Business Systems in 2012. It covers inventory optimization, delivery dispatch, financial management, customer relationship management, and more recently warehouse management, as well as supplying business analytics.N/A
IFS Applications
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Pricing
Epicor BisTrackIFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor BisTrackIFS Applications
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor BisTrackIFS Applications
Features
Epicor BisTrackIFS Applications
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.8
2 Ratings
7% below category average
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Single sign-on capability7.52 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.12 Ratings9.75 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.3
3 Ratings
0% below category average
IFS Applications
8.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Dashboards7.03 Ratings8.15 Ratings
Standard reports7.92 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Custom reports6.92 Ratings9.45 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
6.3
1 Ratings
20% below category average
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Accounts payable7.01 Ratings9.45 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.01 Ratings9.45 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.01 Ratings8.74 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
2 Ratings
4% below category average
IFS Applications
8.9
5 Ratings
12% above category average
Inventory tracking8.82 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.12 Ratings9.45 Ratings
Location management8.01 Ratings9.45 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
2 Ratings
3% below category average
IFS Applications
6.0
5 Ratings
26% below category average
Pricing7.01 Ratings8.75 Ratings
Order entry8.01 Ratings8.35 Ratings
Cost of goods sold7.92 Ratings7.85 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings8.14 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
5.0
1 Ratings
39% below category average
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Plug-ins5.01 Ratings8.75 Ratings
API for custom integration00 Ratings8.75 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
2 Ratings
7% below category average
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Billing Management6.92 Ratings7.84 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.01 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.01 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.3
1 Ratings
4% above category average
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling7.01 Ratings9.64 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers8.01 Ratings8.64 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.01 Ratings7.64 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.01 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.6
1 Ratings
8% above category average
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.01 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Contract Authoring8.01 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Contract Repository8.01 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated7.01 Ratings9.34 Ratings
Supplier Management7.01 Ratings9.34 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
8.0
1 Ratings
19% above category average
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Issue Detection8.01 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Remediation and Certification8.01 Ratings7.74 Ratings
Risk Repository00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.2
2 Ratings
5% above category average
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.82 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.01 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.01 Ratings7.62 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.01 Ratings7.13 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management7.01 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
1 Ratings
6% below category average
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
11% below category average
Production Process Design7.01 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Production Management7.01 Ratings8.74 Ratings
Configuration Management7.01 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Work Execution7.01 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs7.01 Ratings9.44 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
7.0
2 Ratings
2% below category average
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Forecasting6.52 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Inventory Planning7.01 Ratings9.44 Ratings
Performance Monitoring7.52 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.3
3 Ratings
52% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings7.23 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings5.73 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.5
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor BisTrack
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.43 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Epicor BisTrackIFS Applications
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.5 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.5 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epicor BisTrackIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(3 ratings)
8.4
(5 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor BisTrackIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
Epicor Software
Specifically Eipcor comes in handy daily by easily tracking manpower, deliveries, inspections, and other daily tracked items. It is well suited for day to day operations where others can fill in or pick up if somewhere were out of the office. Epicor is less appropriate in providing weekly updates to teams and customers. It is easier to extract the necessary information off of the software to generate your own reports then try to procure one using the software itself.
Read full review
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Pros
Epicor Software
  • Inventory Management
  • Pricing and Quoting Features
  • Sales and Order Processing
  • Business Analytics
Read full review
IFS
  • It supports the web version in most later versions.
  • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
  • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
  • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
  • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
Read full review
Cons
Epicor Software
  • Support takes too much time
  • Cannot make certain changes, must contact support
Read full review
IFS
  • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
Read full review
Usability
Epicor Software
Epicor BisTrack is essential for those in the lumber and building materials industry, especially if they are in the wholesale/distribution side of things. I provided the rating because I feel that BisTrack has contributed a lot for my company and provided with essential information for decision-making on a day-to-day basis. The score also reflects that while BisTrack is an essential software for my business, there is also room for improvement so that the end users will be able to obtain what they need from the software.
Read full review
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
Support Rating
Epicor Software
Apologies, our company's IT department contacts support on our behalf. I have never contacted Epicor BisTrack's support myself; only through my company's IT team.
Read full review
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Epicor Software
Epicor BisTrack helps keep track of things better and it in fact much easier to use.
Read full review
IFS
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Epicor Software
  • Epicor allows any team player to step into a project and have everything at their fingertips that is well trained in the software
  • Epicor seamlessly allows cross communication between teams on RFI's, meetings and subcontractors
Read full review
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of