Unanet ERP GovCon is software for government contractors offered on-premise or in the cloud. Features include resource planning, skills management, budgeting, forecasting, time tracking, expense reporting, billing, revenue recognition, and project status and performance reporting.
N/A
Pricing
Epicor CMS
Unanet ERP GovCon
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor CMS
Unanet ERP GovCon
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Epicor CMS
Unanet ERP GovCon
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.3
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Dashboards
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.5
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.4
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Pricing
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Billing Management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
7.4
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
34% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.8
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
7.3
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Control Management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.8
1 Ratings
23% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
31% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Forecasting
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.1
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Unanet ERP GovCon
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Feature
Epicor CMS
-
Ratings
Unanet ERP GovCon
8.5
5 Ratings
10% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
7.35 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
9.92 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.15 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
9.14 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.65 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Epicor CMS and Unanet ERP GovCon
Through daily use of Epicor, it is apparent that at it's basest level, it favors a stock-based manufacturing model (your company has established SKUs and Production works to replenish stock levels when a KANBAN or other system triggers a re-order point). While it excels at that, ours is a custom-order industrial manufacturing model (we produce to customer specification or repeat orders), meaning there is no stocking of finished components, only the materials it takes to make them. It's taken some finesse (and the purchase of additional modules) to get to where we need to be.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unanet is a great system and has really helped our managers gain more insight to their projects. We have faster timesheet completion rates which leads to faster billing. We have been very happy with the system but there are some trial and error scenarios where it takes us some time to actually get the data needed or use the system the way we need it to be utilized. Thankfully they do have a great support staff that assists with issues as they arise.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The support of Unanet is incredible, A simple email to their support team always gets a response in less than 24 hours and is really solutions focused. Unanet support is the best out there- guaranteed
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Epicor CMS had a UI that was deemed more aesthetically pleasing than (subjective, naturally!) Sage, for which we attended a presentation/orientation session. Our Team felt Epicor (once outfitted with the necessary add-ons) would be better suited in the long run for longevity and ongoing support (especially considering our outgoing software was Sage).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We were used to Deltek's Costpoint from the prior company and Unanet is far easier to use for users, accounting personnel, project managers, and corporate managers. Continuous enhancements lead us to believe that Unanet will be even better in meeting our needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Epicor has necessitated dedicated "Staging" personnel, as multi-line orders are generated as individual orders to Production/Manufacturing, meaning someone must ensure they all come together upon completion prior to shipping.
Payroll and Accounts Payable/Receivable have noted improved integration and tracking compared to the legacy/outgoing software (Business Vision).
Inventory tracking is vastly improved over the outgoing software, with detailed reports/tracking of remnant/off-cut materials, which benefits Material Handlers as well as the Purchasing Manager for keeping the inventory budget in line with targets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info