F5 Beacon vs. IBM Instana

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 Beacon
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
F5 Beacon an open source tool used to gain full visibility across an application landscape, obtain app insights and business intelligence, and make better-informed decisions. With the Beacon Insight Engine, users can leverage pre-built insights or create custom insights. Beacon also integrates with many types of deployments across hybrid and multi-cloud environments—and provides a set of app stats in a simple SaaS model.
$0
IBM Instana
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Instana, an IBM company since the December 2020 acquisition, provides APM services for SOA, microservices, containerized applications and Kubernetes, and cloud native applications, as well as discovery and monitoring for IT assets.
$75
per month per Managed Virtual Server (MVS)
Pricing
F5 BeaconIBM Instana
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$20
per month per Managed Virtual Server (MVS)
Standard
$75
per month per Managed Virtual Server (MVS)
Self-Hosted
$93.80
per month per Managed Virtual Server (MVS)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 BeaconIBM Instana
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
F5 BeaconIBM Instana
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
F5 Beacon
9.5
2 Ratings
21% above category average
IBM Instana
-
Ratings
Application monitoring10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Threshold alerts9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive capabilities9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Application performance management console9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration tools9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 BeaconIBM Instana
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.5 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.5 out of 10
NetBrain Technologies
NetBrain Technologies
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 BeaconIBM Instana
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(47 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 BeaconIBM Instana
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
It is very well suited in complex, multi-cloud application environments where it provides holistic, application-centric visibility by ingesting data from NGINX and other telemetry sources. It helps troubleshoot performance issues in high-availability and regulated environments where outages have a high impact on strict SLAs. It is less appropriate in situations where organizations rely on unmaintained or archived integrations.
Read full review
IBM
With enterprise IT assets in a multitude of ecosystems, cloud infrastructures and sometimes still left stuck in a legacy on prem architecture, IBM Instana makes it easy to get the right data to drive development and / or DevSecOps processes with tangible input from the target environment itself.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • Accelerated troubleshooting and root cause analysis
  • Unified application visibility across hybrid environments
  • Business level insight & KPI correlation
Read full review
IBM
  • Can monitor application(s) and system(s) with very large throughput of transactions by the second ( it gets everything !!!)
  • Provide strong drill down for your applications and will tell you where the points of failure of an application's is ( servers , network , Databases , etc you name it )
  • Very easy to set up and have it up and running when using the SaaS solution. There's an on premise solution which works just as well but requires more effort and preparation from an infrastructure point of view for your teams to implement.
  • Continuously improve their features and their agents auto-update and keep up. All while not interfering with your applications.
  • Let's you create your own dashboards and visualizations that can be tailored for different kind of users with the data collected.
  • Create your own events and smart alerts so you can know on the spot if something is happening or is likely to happen that needs addressing on your applications / systems
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • F5 needs improvement in Platform Stability and Maintenance gaps.
  • It has limited built-in insights and relies heavily on customization.
  • Application modeling and data ingestion setup is complex.
Read full review
IBM
  • It's very difficult to create custom dashboards, only a handful of scenarios can be visualized to dashboards.
  • Extracting information from Instana to further analysis into excel for example is something that can be improved. Using an API to get data is very limiting.
  • Open telemetry features which allow to send application data to Instana is not working as documented.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
No answers on this topic
IBM
Instana has been able to fulfill our all requirement and provide out of box solution for multiple component like AWS RDS Monitoring and real time alerting setup on basis of that. it is also easy to integrate with other open-source alerting and monitoring tools which makes it easier to incorporate into our solutions
Read full review
Usability
F5
The reason of giving above rating of 10 is that it offers intuitive, centralized dashboard which reduces the need to switch between multiple tools making it easier for IT teams to quickly assess application health. Moreover it offers easy correlation of technical and business metrics by linking application performance data directly to business KPIs. the major benefit of using Beacon is that it simplifies troubleshooting workflow which reduces Mean Time To Resolution hence improving productivity and minimizing downtime.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Instana totally alters our monitoring approach since it increases the stability of the system and simplifies the process of problem solving. And since it helps to lower the degree of alert exhaustion that we experience, it is a total game changer for us.
Read full review
Support Rating
F5
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM instana support team is good but when we ask them for support, they keep asking same thing again and again and mostly there is no solution
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
F5
F5 Beacon is best for F5-centric, hybrid, app-centric visibility, whereas Datadog is best for cloud-native, distributed observability. F5 beacon is superior for understanding BIG-IP flows, WAF, ADC behavior at the app level. It has a unified view of F5-powered applications. F5 Beacon simplifies troubleshooting across multicloud F5 deployments. Beacon provides business logic level visibility.
Read full review
IBM
As a DevOps engineer, I've explored various Application Performance Monitoring (APM) tools, including New Relic for real-time insights, AppDynamics for code-level visibility, Dynatrace for AI-driven monitoring, Datadog for comprehensive observability, Splunk for log management, Stackify Retrace for error tracking, and Raygun for crash reporting. Each tool offers distinct features, and the choice depends on specific use cases, technology stacks, and organizational needs. Thorough evaluations, considering factors like ease of use, integration capabilities, and scalability, help in selecting the most suitable APM solution for effective application monitoring in a DevOps environment.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • Positive: Reduced downtime costs
  • Positive: Improved IT efficiency
  • Positive: Better business-IT alignment
  • Negative: Scaling costs in large enterprises.
Read full review
IBM
  • Increase up time by early failure identification and performance optimization based on findings in Instana.
  • Enhance user experience by mapping user issues with backend failures
  • Automated actions help fixing known issues without human intervention
  • increase support team efficiency by root cause analysis which decrease the incident solving time
Read full review
ScreenShots