F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | F5 Networks provides BIG-IP Access Policy Manager as an identity and access solution which can be deployed as a standalone solution or as an add-on to F5 Networks' flagship BIG-IP TLM or F5 Advanced WAF applications. | N/A |
Veracode | Score8.5 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 24 Answers | 92% Would buy again 131 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
96% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | 96% Delivers good value for the price 93 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | 95% Happy with the feature set 135 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 79 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 20 Answers | 87% Implementation went as expected 104 Answers | |
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | Veracode | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Private Network |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Checkmarx Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.3 | 6.3 |
| Usability | 8.2 | 5.5 |
| Availability | - | 7.3 |
| Performance | - | 2.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.5 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.4 |
| Product Scalability | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Veracode Screenshots |








