F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack vs. Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | A solution to deploy and orchestrate applications on a managed Kubernetes platform with centralized, SaaS-based management of distributed applications with a single pane of glass and rich observability. Simplified by managing deployments as one across on-prem, cloud, and edge locations. | N/A |
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated. | N/A |
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 9 Answers | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 9 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
71% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | |
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 5.5 | - |
| Usability | 7.8 | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.6 | - |
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]()
|
|
| Support Rating | ![]()
|
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Incentivized |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |


