F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack vs. Microsoft Azure
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | A solution to deploy and orchestrate applications on a managed Kubernetes platform with centralized, SaaS-based management of distributed applications with a single pane of glass and rich observability. Simplified by managing deployments as one across on-prem, cloud, and edge locations. | N/A |
Microsoft Azure | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. | $29 per month |
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Azure | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | The free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Azure | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 9 Answers | 92% Would buy again 34 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 94% Delivers good value for the price 31 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 9 Answers | 95% Happy with the feature set 35 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 89% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 24 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
71% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 94% Implementation went as expected 34 Answers | |
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Azure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Azure | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Azure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 5.5 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Availability | - | 6.8 |
| Support Rating | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.6 | 8.0 |
| F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack | Microsoft Azure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]()
|
|
| Usability | ![]()
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]()
|
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]()
|
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Incentivized |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |






