FigJam vs. GatherContent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FigJam
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.
$5
per month per editor
GatherContent
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
GatherContent headquartered in London offers their content operations, collaboration and governance platform for enterprises.N/A
Pricing
FigJamGatherContent
Editions & Modules
FigJam Professional
$36
per year per editor
FigJam Organization
$60
per year per editor
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FigJamGatherContent
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FigJamGatherContent
Features
FigJamGatherContent
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
GatherContent
9.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
GatherContent
7.5
1 Ratings
3% below category average
API00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
GatherContent
8.4
1 Ratings
8% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
GatherContent
8.7
1 Ratings
16% above category average
SEO support00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FigJamGatherContent
Small Businesses
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.1 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Miro
Miro
Score 9.2 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FigJamGatherContent
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(6 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FigJamGatherContent
Likelihood to Recommend
Figma
If you're working in small product teams, like triads, and already using Figma, this is a no brainer for white boarding, quick/fast sketches, wireframing, collaborative doodling ... it gets less appropriate with large teams, infrequent. IMO, due to the way in which they price, it's better to keep the inner circle small-ish.
Read full review
GatherContent
We create and manage content for various client's websites. The customizable workflows, assignments and user roles help us keep everyone accountable to deadlines. It is transparent, collaborative, and more efficient for all.
Read full review
Pros
Figma
  • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
  • Easy to preview
  • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
Read full review
GatherContent
  • Easy to navigate interface.
  • Customizable workflow.
  • Set up project templates for recurring projects.
Read full review
Cons
Figma
  • It misses easy-to-use pre sets of diagrams. The ones presented seem to be not native and hard to use. Miro is a good benchmark.
  • Navegating throught projects in the main page is confusing, specially when people are not admin users.
  • It should suggest ways of organizing the pages designers do, specially when the project is big and have many pages and sections.
  • It could have, for example, a draft version for every page, so that one can hide it when they finish the work, but can open it whenever something needs to be modified, versioning the job.
Read full review
GatherContent
  • Getting emails for every single change is really annoying.
  • It seems pretty easy, but I suggest you take time to train anyone who will be working on it.
  • API integrations could be better as it doesn't work 100% of the time.
  • Layouts created are static and you can not move the order.
Read full review
Usability
Figma
I don't use it often, because the organization I work in uses a different environment on a commo basis. This is rather used between the designers, who prototype the solutions in Figma - they just have it as a workbook/notebook for their ideas. However, if those need to be shared with stakeholders or other organization members, the designers are expected to use a different environment.
Read full review
GatherContent
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Figma
FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the experience much more engaging.
Read full review
GatherContent
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Figma
  • FigJam saves a lot of time ... it's nice to have all my visual notes/sketches within Figma itself where a lot of design work lives
  • The project organization and other features contribute to the ease of answering that age old question ... "where can I find that mockup?"
  • Dev Mode is pretty cool. Not many use it, so some designers may spend unnecessary time spec'ing out things that no one will appreciate, let alone look at.
Read full review
GatherContent
  • Accountability to deadlines and roles.
  • Less emails and less multiple documents.
  • Large scale content management for new websites.
Read full review
ScreenShots