FigJam vs. TIBCO Tibbr

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FigJam
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.
$5
per month per editor
TIBCO Tibbr
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Enterprise collaboration platform.N/A
Pricing
FigJamTIBCO Tibbr
Editions & Modules
FigJam Professional
$36
per year per editor
FigJam Organization
$60
per year per editor
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FigJamTIBCO Tibbr
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
FigJamTIBCO Tibbr
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
TIBCO Tibbr
6.5
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Mobile Access00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Search00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
FigJam
-
Ratings
TIBCO Tibbr
9.6
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Chat00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FigJamTIBCO Tibbr
Small Businesses
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Miro
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FigJamTIBCO Tibbr
Likelihood to Recommend
6.7
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
FigJamTIBCO Tibbr
Likelihood to Recommend
Figma
It is well suited when people use it to sketch the first wireframes of the UX, like the Breadboarding technique from Basecamp. I used to work like that when modifying some UX. Our designers used to sketch over our current experience wireframe, and then we could discuss it by using the comments in Figjam or the Call feature at FigJam. That made it easy to discuss it. When building up group boards to discuss ideas, I use Miro, once it has more native pre-sets that help conducts the discussion.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
I think it is well-suited for populations who value social media and being connected in this manner at work. If the population does not value this type of open interaction, it will be underutilized. Many of our baby-boomer generation staff have a hard time seeing the relevancy of a site such as this.
Read full review
Pros
Figma
  • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
  • Easy to preview
  • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • I think it helps people crowd source an organization for information and resources that may not be easily found.
  • The subjects feature is a great place to develop communities of practice where links, files and communication can be shared.
  • As long as the search engine is optimized / working effectively, it can be a powerful way to access sites and resources across the organization.
Read full review
Cons
Figma
  • Less Rigidity
  • Ability to work with Different Documents
  • A light version of Figma
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • The profile finder is glitchy and rarely comes up with solid results.
  • The site sometimes has glitches, such as subject pages not loading and complete content not appearing on the screen until you refresh or give it an abnormal amount of time to load.
  • The "USAID Search" option should appear first for the search results. It is not intuitive that it is the last search option to select. Often users don't even clearly recognize that they need to select types of search results.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Figma
Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has more pre-set diagrams than FigJam and they are native and easy to use FigJam is paid, while draw.io is not.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Figma
  • I believe that creating professional projects inside a web app feels amateurish.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • I feel that it has connected colleagues who would have never met in our global organization.
  • I has created a division in the organization between the users and those who oppose its existence.
  • It has been a great place for communication-oriented departments to get their messages out, advertise events, etc.
Read full review
ScreenShots