TrustRadius

FigJam vs. ViewSonic ViewBoard

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FigJam
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
FigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.
$5
per month per editor
ViewSonic ViewBoard
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
ViewSonic ViewBoard is an interactive flat panel display that supports content sharing and interactive touch. ViewBoard displays help to better facilitate presentations, brainstorming, and decision-making. ViewBoard comprises the IFP series of boards (IFP50, IFP60, and IFP70), and the myViewBoard software tool that enables teachers to build dynamic lesson plans, import engaging content, and share lessons with students.N/A
Pricing
FigJamViewSonic ViewBoard
Editions & Modules
FigJam Professional
$36
per year per editor
FigJam Organization
$60
per year per editor
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FigJamViewSonic ViewBoard
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FigJamViewSonic ViewBoard
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
FigJamViewSonic ViewBoard
Small Businesses
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
Canva
Canva
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Miro
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
Miro
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FigJamViewSonic ViewBoard
Likelihood to Recommend
6.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FigJamViewSonic ViewBoard
Likelihood to Recommend
Figma
It is well suited when people use it to sketch the first wireframes of the UX, like the Breadboarding technique from Basecamp. I used to work like that when modifying some UX. Our designers used to sketch over our current experience wireframe, and then we could discuss it by using the comments in Figjam or the Call feature at FigJam. That made it easy to discuss it. When building up group boards to discuss ideas, I use Miro, once it has more native pre-sets that help conducts the discussion.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ViewSonic
No answers on this topic
Pros
Figma
  • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
  • Easy to preview
  • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ViewSonic
No answers on this topic
Cons
Figma
  • Less Rigidity
  • Ability to work with Different Documents
  • A light version of Figma
RL
Rogelio Leal
UX/UI Designer
Read full review
ViewSonic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Figma
Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has more pre-set diagrams than FigJam and they are native and easy to use FigJam is paid, while draw.io is not.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ViewSonic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Figma
  • I believe that creating professional projects inside a web app feels amateurish.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ViewSonic
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots