Flagsmith vs. Tricentis qTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Flagsmith
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Flagsmith, from the company of the same name in London, allows users to manage feature flags across web, mobile and server side applications in order to deliver true Continuous Integration and get builds out faster, as well as control who has access to new features. Flagsmtih offers a hosted API, or it can be deployed to a private cloud, or run on-premise.N/A
Tricentis qTest
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.
$1,200
per year per user
Pricing
FlagsmithTricentis qTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FlagsmithTricentis qTest
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FlagsmithTricentis qTest
Features
FlagsmithTricentis qTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Flagsmith
-
Ratings
Tricentis qTest
8.2
39 Ratings
1% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings7.938 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings8.533 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.78 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.938 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings7.933 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FlagsmithTricentis qTest
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FlagsmithTricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(39 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
FlagsmithTricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend
Flagsmith
Flagsmith is the best tool I worked with for feature flags, in terms of how easy and intuitive it is to use. On the other hand, it has all the features we need to effectively manage features.
Read full review
Tricentis
Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place.
Read full review
Pros
Flagsmith
  • Controle features feasability
  • Create user segements
  • Mange multiple environments
Read full review
Tricentis
  • As a fresher, when I started using qTest it was very handy and easy to understand.
  • It helps us trace the test cases that are used to test the quality in a single location
  • The main thing is its integration with JIRA as soon as we create a ticket we would be getting all the requirements in the qTest so it became easy for me
Read full review
Cons
Flagsmith
  • Search users based on traits
Read full review
Tricentis
  • In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve.
  • Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Flagsmith
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
Read full review
Usability
Flagsmith
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
First and foremost, getting access to the tool for any user for a specific project is easy. Once the user access is provisioned, in a matter of few clicks, he can understand the navigation and various tabs and features like the test plan, test set, test lab, test case creation, review and approval.
Read full review
Support Rating
Flagsmith
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Flagsmith
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Flagsmith
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
Read full review
Return on Investment
Flagsmith
  • We can be very flexible to client needs by quickly deploying new features behind flags.
  • We can support the sales dept by deploying demo features without risk to stability.
Read full review
Tricentis
  • In comparison to other Testing tools, Tricentis qTest was the most expensive.
  • We were able to quickly bring international users up to speed on how to use the tool.
  • The ability to clone a project rather than create a new one from scratch was a valuable time saver.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tricentis qTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards