FloQast vs. RiskSeal
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FloQast | Score8.9 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail. | N/A |
RiskSeal | N/A | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | RiskSeal is an alternative credit risk platform that helps lenders see what traditional bureaus miss. It analyzes digital footprint data to help lenders understand the person behind the application, not just their past repayment records. Credit providers use RiskSeal as an extra predictive layer on top of their existing scoring models to improve risk segmentation, reduce defaults, increase approval rates, and add fresh insight to limited or outdated credit… | $499 per month |
| FloQast | RiskSeal | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Pay-as-you-go, transaction-based payment method. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FloQast | RiskSeal | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 151 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 135 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
99% Happy with the feature set 150 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 98 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 102 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| FloQast | RiskSeal | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidation and Close |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| FloQast | RiskSeal | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | BlackLine Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | BlackLine Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FloQast | RiskSeal | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.4 | - |
| Usability | 8.2 | - |
| Availability | 5.6 | - |
| Performance | 7.3 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.9 | - |
| In-Person Training | 9.1 | - |
| Online Training | 7.4 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 | - |
| Configurability | 7.3 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 7.3 | - |
| Ease of integration | 7.3 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.2 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 7.3 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 7.3 | - |
| FloQast | RiskSeal | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| In-Person Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Online Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | FloQast Screenshots | RiskSeal Screenshots |










