FluidSurveys was a survey and form building option. SurveyMonkey discontinued the product, it reached end of life (EOL) December 2017.
N/A
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Score8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016.
Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.
N/A
Pricing
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of FluidSurveys (Discontinued) and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Feature
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
-
Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
5.3
3 Ratings
45% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
00 Ratings
6.13 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
MDM Integration
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of FluidSurveys (Discontinued) and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Feature
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
-
Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
7.0
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Visualization
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of FluidSurveys (Discontinued) and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Feature
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
-
Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
4.8
3 Ratings
52% below category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
00 Ratings
5.13 Ratings
Data Transformations
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Data Encryption
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Built-in Processors
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of FluidSurveys (Discontinued) and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Feature
FluidSurveys (Discontinued)
-
Ratings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.0
3 Ratings
34% below category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of FluidSurveys (Discontinued) and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
For surveys, and for centralized info-gathering, FluidSurveys provides an excellent solution. There are other programs out there which provide a wider range of solutions (i.e., they can be used for surveying AND comprehensive online engagement, rather than just a data-gathering type of consultation); however, for programming and implementing surveys, FluidSurveys has an effective variety of strengths and options that make it optimal for users who are focused specifically on surveys.
If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
User-friendly. For the majority of the general and basic tools you can use with FluidSurveys to build surveys are simple to use and intuitive. When certain issues come up, the service is quick (chat room) and effective.
Anonymity: the software has the reputation of being safer in terms of safeguarding private information the respondents share by answering surveys (this is mainly due to the fact that the servers are in Canada). Thus, indirectly, they increase response rates.
Extensive possibilities: FluidSurveys offers a plethora of possibilities and options that really renders the experience interesting in terms of micro-managing each details of the surveys you are sending out there. When the invitation leaves by email, it is exactly how you want it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Note: I am responding to this question as a user of the system and not a representative of my organization.
On a personal level/as a user only, I would definitely continue to use FluidSurveys.On a personal level/as a user only, I would definitely continue to use FluidSurveys.
In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
I think the average person can very quickly pick up on the basics of the system: they would have no problems programming and launching a basic survey. Organizations may benefit from having people of different backgrounds getting their hands dirty in the system: at a minimum, both web programmers and opinion research advisors should be solicited for input or help.
It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Although I do not have much experience with Survey Monkey, the only two reasons why I choose FluidSurveys is that clients demand it (privacy and anonymity) and because managing multiple surveys at a time is easier. As for ODK Collect, I think it is a valuable alternative to FluidSurveys if you have time to learn the coding (not very complicated). ODK is a little less user friendly and you cannot address small details as you can with FluidSurveys (e.g.: formatting).
The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info