TrustRadius

Flux Project vs. IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Flux
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
The Flux Project, or just Flux, is an open and extensible continuous delivery solution for Kubernetes available free under an Apache 2.0 license. Flux and Flagger deploy apps with canaries, feature flags, and A/B rollouts. Flux enables application deployment (CD) and (with the help of Flagger) progressive delivery (PD) through automatic reconciliation.N/A
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery, available on IBM Cloud, allows users to provision an integrated toolchain using customizable, shareable templates with tools from IBM, third parties and open source. Automate builds and tests with Tekton-based delivery pipelines, and control quality with analytics.
$0
Pricing
Flux ProjectIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Lite
$0.00
Professional
$35.00
Authorized user per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FluxIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Flux ProjectIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Considered Both Products
Flux

No answer on this topic

IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Its better than them
A. Kıvanç Güler | TrustRadius Reviewer
A. Kıvanç Güler
Hybrid Cloud Automation Sales Leader, Finance
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Best fit for IBM Cloud and IBM Hybrid cloud strategy. Very well suited for RedHat Openshift and cloud-native build packs. Complementary solution for Enterprise Java workloads transformation and modernization journey such as java microservices development lifecycle and also …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud developer tools had good support for mobile and web based applications and seemed relatively easy to integrate to our applications. We have other IBM tools so it had a slight edge over others when we compared.
SS
Saurabh Shukla
Python trainee
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Google Cloud AI provides better speech-to-text integration for applications in which the word recognition ability is far good.
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud Developer Tools stack up against Visual Studios and other integration suites, with an agnostic approach. IBM Cloud Developer tools integrate seamlessly with your existing stack to augment and accelerate data science and analytics projects at large. Tools are designed …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
This is recommended over other applications as it has a continuous delivery for non-mission critical applications also which has simple proof of concepts and this is reliable. Also, the integration to different platforms along with cloud implementation is an add-on. The ease of …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud Developer Tools is way easier than Jenkins and most of the features Jenkins has are not useful for us and the features we wanted were absent ButIBM Cloud Developer Tools saved our lives and is perfect in all aspects as we can easily develop and deploy. The only thing …
Dylan Eikelenboom | TrustRadius Reviewer
Dylan Eikelenboom
Security Officer
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Both competitors listed work in a similar manner; you can automate the deployment of servers using configuration files and the command line. The difference is that Ansible and Terraform are provider-agnostic, meaning you can use them for other hosting providers as well (AWS, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Mainly, AWS offers 5G services which are futuristic. AWS has More products than IBM Cloud & it offers High Parallel Performance & Computing. Better global coverage than IBM Cloud & Rigid SLAs with credit compensation

Coming to Microsoft Azure, its user interface is very easy to …
LB
Lingaiah B
Subject Matter Expert
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Eclipse with IBM Cloud Foundry and Kubernets we used to develop application in on premises and deployed into the cloud. And we created containers, created many projects and deployed into the cloud by using Continuous Delivery in IBM Cloud. Great service and great support. IBM …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
There's not really a technical background on the decision of using IBM Cloud Continuous delivery. Our CTO assisted to a conference where IBM was promoting their services and offering a free tier. As in that instance the company was starting, every free tier offering was well …
PH
Philippe Herlin
Cloud BU Leader
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
CI/CD is much more user friendly than Jenkins.
It better integrates to IBM Cloud features.
On the other side, Jenkins deployed in a VM or better, on a K8S cluster is a less expensive solution.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
I find IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery service way easier to set up compared to Travis CI. The visual interface helps you navigate throughout the service effortlessly. I used Travis CI 2 years ago, although it wasn't complicated, I took more time to create and set up an instance …
Features
Flux ProjectIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Flux Project
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
8.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Search00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Flux Project
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
DevOps Tool Integrations00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Code Review00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Code Collaboration00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Velocity Calculation00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Flux ProjectIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Flux ProjectIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Flux ProjectIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
It provides a cloud-based integrated development environment that integrates with other IBM Cloud services to provide a streamlined development workflow. This includes real-time collaboration and code sharing capabilities, making it easy for teams to work together on projects. This feature is very useful for our app to maintain the code
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • It contains the deployment templates which are much more time saving and is of great use.
  • This has the integration of the Cloud applications which makes the work much more convenient.
  • This is flexible when it comes to development, deployment, and delivery.
  • [It] also has a much more reasonable pricing.
  • Provides space for the data storage.
  • [IBM Cloud Developer Tools] also can support many useful tools.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Its price is quite high and this made it unsuitable for us as we cannot afford such high rates.
  • Its Setup takes much longer time and this is frustrating.
  • Its interface needs to be improved and easy even for the Newbies.
Kayla Risher | TrustRadius Reviewer
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It's a great platform to develop, run, test and deploy the applications easily. And it makes very easier and secure the implementation of continuous delivery process. For first time and experts also can use this service so easily. Great service provided by the IBM Cloud Continuous Service. There are more services that helps a lot to work on it. Thanks a lot.
LB
Lingaiah B
Subject Matter Expert
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Nothing special to say : the UX is clear and simple.
PH
Philippe Herlin
Cloud BU Leader
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
In more than a year using the IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery tool, I haven't had any major complaints or problems. However, in the last month, IBM suffered from a couple of problems through several of its services, and for a short period of time, I couldn't deploy successfully my projects. The problem was brief and was quickly fixed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate with our current environment and applications
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • This has made the configuration files much easier to access.
  • Has made the commands more logical as well as easy for use and learning.
  • Contains great AI capabilities
  • The documentation needs improvement.
  • Error received from commands are pretty hard to understand.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots