Fluxx in San Francisco offers Grantmaker, this being their grant management platform for funders, providing clear data exploration tools and customizable dashboard, dynamic workflow with audit trail, and many collaboration and sharing tools.
N/A
IFS Applications
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
Fluxx Grantmaker
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fluxx Grantmaker
IFS Applications
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Fluxx Grantmaker
IFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.7
3 Ratings
46% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.85 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.55 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.32 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.32 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Feature
Fluxx Grantmaker
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Fluxx Grantmaker and IFS Applications
Fluxx is well-suited for use by both small and large non-profits. Fluxx provides an intuitive interface and accurately houses grant proposal application data. Fluxx may be less useful at organizations where multiple funding layers exist, such as at community foundations which house multiple philanthropic funds. Fluxx has been an excellent product over the 10 years I have worked with it
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have an assigned rep who is very responsive and is able to answer any questions. Other than that, the technical support has been terrible. I often don't waste time documenting bugs because I know they likely won't get fixed or even followed-up on. Instead, I search for workarounds.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Not included above because it is not in the system is Salesforce Foundation Connect. Again, I am always hesitant with this type of question. We selected grant maker because it offered the best fit for our organization's working style and culture. There is also a personal level of service that Fluxx offers that differed from other vendors (Smart Simple is similar in this way too). At the time we made the selection, one of the main influencers was the number of large foundations adopting the platform. As they invested in features, those features rolled out to the rest of the clients. This offered us access to functionality we would not have been able to afford otherwise. We moved from another vendor whose platform allowed for customization as well, but if they built it for one client, you still had to pay for it and pay ongoing yearly fees. So, the SAAS model adopted by Fluxx appealed to us. This has paid dividends as features have been developed. For example, one large foundation added the capability to track program-related investments alongside normal grantmaking activities within Fluxx. This is not functionality we could have paid to develop, but we have program-related investments that we wanted to track alongside grants and that feature was available to us because the development was paid for by that funder. That said, most of the above vendors have compelling products (as well as others), so be sure you look at your options and talk to users (other than the ones they provide you in the reference list) and check the Idealware guides
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info