FortiCNAPP vs. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FortiCNAPP | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | FortiCNAPP is an enterprise Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms solution that unifies security posture management, developer code scanning, cloud identity governance, and runtime threat detection into a single management console. FortiCNAPP represents the evolution of Fortinet's cloud security portfolio following its acquisition of Lacework in August 2024. Formerly marketed as Lacework FortiCNAPP, the platform incorporates Lacework's foundational polygraph behavioral analysis engine… | N/A |
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps organizations efficiently detect, mitigate and respond to known and unknown advanced threats that target people and VIPs through email. TAP provides unparalleled effectiveness in stopping targeted attacks that use polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and credential-stealing phishing techniques to obtain sensitive information. TAP seamlessly integrates with the Proofpoint secure email gateway (Proofpoint Email Protection) to deliver best… | N/A |
| FortiCNAPP | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FortiCNAPP | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 88% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| FortiCNAPP | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Microsoft Defender for Cloud Score8.7 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FortiCNAPP | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.1 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 5.3 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.9 |
| FortiCNAPP | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



