| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | With Foundant GLM, users can create, launch and receive online applications and grant reports, manage online proposal reviews, and manage grants and information from a single, integrated solution from anywhere they have internet access. | N/A |
| Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager I selected GLM for the intuitive nature of the system and its ability to communicate with the other software platforms we utilize. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager The decision to choose Grant Lifecycle Manager was made before I began in this position, but we have renewed our license because we were so happy with the service. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager GLM had the right combination of structure, utility, customer-focus, price that made it the most appealing. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager I used GIFTS more than 10 years ago. Their development was glacial, and it was clumsy software. They took much longer to develop the on-line application process.
I also reviewed Philan Tech. They did not offer the same flexibility that Foundant's GLM did. Nor did the … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager We used MicroEdge GIFTS (server hosted, not online) for about five years, but became frustrated with the fact that their improvements were not provided to existing users of the product unless they purchased additional modules, usually at $20K+ each, even though we had to pay … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager I have not used other online grantmaking products or evaluated others. I used to use MicroEdge Gifts, but not the online application version. It was a stand alone management system. This is hands-down better, easier to use and a more complete system. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager We selected GLM 7 years ago and have not regretted that decision. It's extremely reasonably priced and their customer service is outstanding. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager We are former GIFTS clients. GIFTS was good but expensive for our small organization and had declining customer service. The GIFTS product we owned had several add on modules which added to the cost and made the product disjointed. Foundant's Grant Lifecycle Management was more … Chose Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager In 2011 we demoed and reviewd IGAM, Good Done Great, Grant Lifecycle Manager (Foundant) and ChesterCap. Each company and software had strength and weaknesses. We selected Grant Lifecycle Manager based on the product's cost (and how the subscription cost is based); the … |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Blackbaud Grantmaking Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Submittable Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 3.0 |
| Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots |
