Fraud.net Email Sheild vs. Kickbox

Suites will with spams and suspicious mails and links need more improvement on how it works with the option on how to keep or not to keep some mail as some times it deducted some non spam and and suspicious mails as it’s one of them but it always recognised how safe it’s

Incentivized

I haven't used many other email validation products before, only a couple of 'free' cloud-based options with limited list size capability. Kickbox is super professional, easy to use, and works.

Incentivized

• Control over spams mails
• Prevention of suspicious mails
• Data safe keep

Incentivized

• Finding misspelled emails
• Including domain name in Excel output that is produced
• Easy to use software

Incentivized

• Detection links within mails
• Optional to keep of not to keep some mails that looks suspicious
• Details on how it operate within my system

Incentivized

• Catching spam traps
• Too many emails in "unknown" category when cleaning B2B emails
• More accurate cleaning overall

Incentivized

It more generally than the other app as that other one focused on a threaten mails for only one application not for all and doesn’t support mails protection but it’s always more up to date with the new threats and makes me more safe and comfortable while working which helps a lot

Incentivized

I like Kickbox output files better as it includes the "domain". Overall, both softwares could do a better job cleaning lists. Kickbox shows more "unknown" emails where are BriteVerify shows less "unknown emails" but then more bad emails end up in the valid list. Kickbox has a higher threshold to put emails in "unknown".

Incentivized

• Easily to use
• Rarely facing issue
• Always on update with new threats

Incentivized

• Our servers are in great reputation

Incentivized