TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Gatling Enterprise

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    OctoPerf

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOctoPerf is an enterprise-grade performance and load testing platform available both as SaaS and on-premise, designed for engineering teams working on modern, distributed applications. It enables teams to simulate realistic user traffic, identify performance bottlenecks, and validate application scalability through scalable load test execution. By combining advanced load modeling, deep performance analytics, and flexible deployment options, OctoPerf supports a wide…

    $69

    per month

    Pricing
    Gatling EnterpriseOctoPerf
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Basic
    $149
    per month
    Pro
    $649
    per month
    Free
    Free
    On Demand
    Contact sales team
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Gatling EnterpriseOctoPerf
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Both pay-per-test and subscriptions are available.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Gatling EnterpriseOctoPerf
    Considered Both Products
    Gatling
    Chose Gatling Enterprise
    Gatling can only be used for high-load tests with a paid license and only for tests with a reduced graphical user interface (GUI). Unlike OctoPerf, NeoLoad, or LoadRunner, we are not limited to a fixed number of users per license. Compared with JMeter, Gatling is less …
    Incentivized
    OctoPerf
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Gatling EnterpriseOctoPerf
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of Gatling Enterprise and OctoPerf
    Feature
    Gatling Enterprise
    5.8
    1 Ratings
    37% below category average
    OctoPerf
    -
    Ratings
    Record and Automate3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Parallel Testing7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Collaboration6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of Gatling Enterprise and OctoPerf
    Feature
    Gatling Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    OctoPerf
    9.4
    1 Ratings
    10% above category average
    End to end performance management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Integrated performance data00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Real time monitoring00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Gatling EnterpriseOctoPerf
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Gatling EnterpriseOctoPerf
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Gatling EnterpriseOctoPerf
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Gatling
    Gatling requires Scala code to run high-quality scenarios. The recorder helps, but does not provide an immediately usable path. In the results, it is difficult to analyse the errors encountered during a load test. We can identify when errors occur, but it is challenging to pinpoint the cause at a given moment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OctoPerf
    We used OctoPerf on Continuous Integrations and Continuous Deployment as part of load testing because it is very easy to load data on various frameworks and a wide range of validations can be done virtually. We can also design bespoke graphics and reports to aid in the validation of testing scenarios.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Gatling
    • Quick simple report.
    • Heavy loads.
    • API test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OctoPerf
    • Infrastructure for the cloud that is automated.
    • We have the ability to build real-time reports and dashboards.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Gatling
    • Scripting with user interface.
    • More reports.
    • Recording user path.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OctoPerf
    • The version of the runtime needs be upgraded.
    • Additional features should be included.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Gatling
    Our tests are only run via an integration platform (Jenkins), and only the results are analysed using Gatling reports. The difficulty lies in maintaining the Scala scripts, which must keep pace with changes in the application over time. New use cases must be thoroughly documented for testers who are not directly involved in development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OctoPerf
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Gatling
    Gatling can only be used for high-load tests with a paid license and only for tests with a reduced graphical user interface (GUI). Unlike OctoPerf, NeoLoad, or LoadRunner, we are not limited to a fixed number of users per license. Compared with JMeter, Gatling is less resource-intensive and therefore does not require an extensive test infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OctoPerf
    Unravel Data is a cloud optimization tool, whereas OctoPerf can be used to easily run load test cases and scenarios, as well as develop automated cloud infrastructure to generate customized reports on the test cases run. For the greatest possible user experience, we have some additional functionality such as Jmeter and other legacy tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Gatling
    • Re use existing use case.
    • Difficult to add other load generator.
    • Cost reduction for simple tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OctoPerf
    • There is no need to know how to code.
    • Reports made to order.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    OctoPerf Screenshots

    Screenshot of the scripting studio in OctoPerf - no code neededScreenshot of the runtime part of the application. Here you can select multiple injection locations and run several scenarios in a single testScreenshot of live reporting with numerous metrics. The report is completely dynamics.