TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Gatling Enterprise

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    TestGrid

    Score5.6 out of 10
    N/ATestGrid is a web and mobile application automated testing software provider based in Atlanta, Georgia. TestGrid states they are the first to introduce low code tech for automation testing. TestGrid provides end to end SDLC automation solution which accelerates test automation for agile teams.N/A
    Pricing
    Gatling EnterpriseTestGrid
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Gatling EnterpriseTestGrid
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Gatling EnterpriseTestGrid
    Considered Both Products
    Gatling
    No answer on this topic
    TestGrid
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Features
    Gatling EnterpriseTestGrid
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of Gatling Enterprise and TestGrid
    Feature
    Gatling Enterprise
    5.8
    1 Ratings
    37% below category average
    TestGrid
    -
    Ratings
    Record and Automate3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Parallel Testing7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Collaboration6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Gatling EnterpriseTestGrid
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Gatling EnterpriseTestGrid
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.3
    (10 ratings)
    Usability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Gatling EnterpriseTestGrid
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Gatling
    Gatling requires Scala code to run high-quality scenarios. The recorder helps, but does not provide an immediately usable path. In the results, it is difficult to analyse the errors encountered during a load test. We can identify when errors occur, but it is challenging to pinpoint the cause at a given moment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestGrid
    Easy navigation. Test Data Management. Flexible Supports for Automation Testing Sometimes it fails to connect to cloud devices or browsers
    Read full review
    Pros
    Gatling
    • Quick simple report.
    • Heavy loads.
    • API test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestGrid
    • Low barrier to entry for beginner test engineer due to scriptless nature of test case
    • Proficient test engineer could utilize CI/CD Integration
    • Both Browser & Mobile Device Infrastructure Available Natively
    Read full review
    Cons
    Gatling
    • Scripting with user interface.
    • More reports.
    • Recording user path.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestGrid
    • Can be slow in instances where multiple scripts and requests are running on a webpage plus the docs can also be improved
    Read full review
    Usability
    Gatling
    Our tests are only run via an integration platform (Jenkins), and only the results are analysed using Gatling reports. The difficulty lies in maintaining the Scala scripts, which must keep pace with changes in the application over time. New use cases must be thoroughly documented for testers who are not directly involved in development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestGrid
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Gatling
    Gatling can only be used for high-load tests with a paid license and only for tests with a reduced graphical user interface (GUI). Unlike OctoPerf, NeoLoad, or LoadRunner, we are not limited to a fixed number of users per license. Compared with JMeter, Gatling is less resource-intensive and therefore does not require an extensive test infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestGrid
    We frequently came across scenarios which were too cumbersome for manual testing & wanted an easy automation solution. We are now using TestGrid for those scenarios & are happy with the product.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Gatling
    • Re use existing use case.
    • Difficult to add other load generator.
    • Cost reduction for simple tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestGrid
    • we were looking for a remote infrastructure provider so that our remote team could use it for automation as well as manual testing.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots