TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Gatling Enterprise vs. Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Gatling Enterprise

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    Worksoft

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AThe Worksoft Connective Automation Platform is a suite of products that automates business processes from discovery, to testing to RPA. Worksoft Analyze and Worksoft Capture support automated process discovery. Worksoft Certify allows users to create, maintain, share, and consume automated end-to-end business process tests as part of continuous testing, integration, and delivery cycles. Finally, the Connective RPA is codeless solution to reusing automated processes, moving automation into…N/A
    Pricing
    Gatling EnterpriseWorksoft
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Gatling EnterpriseWorksoft
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Gatling EnterpriseWorksoft
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of Gatling Enterprise and Worksoft Connective Automation Platform
    Feature
    Gatling Enterprise
    5.8
    1 Ratings
    37% below category average
    Worksoft Connective Automation Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Record and Automate3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Parallel Testing7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Collaboration6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Gatling EnterpriseWorksoft
    Small Businesses
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Gatling EnterpriseWorksoft
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Gatling EnterpriseWorksoft
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Gatling
    Gatling requires Scala code to run high-quality scenarios. The recorder helps, but does not provide an immediately usable path. In the results, it is difficult to analyse the errors encountered during a load test. We can identify when errors occur, but it is challenging to pinpoint the cause at a given moment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Worksoft
    • As I have worked with various ERP automation tools, Worksoft certify is a best tool in terms of End-to-End testing for SAP business processes.
    • It is easy to understand by business people
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Gatling
    • Quick simple report.
    • Heavy loads.
    • API test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Worksoft
    • Prepared 25 end-to-end scenarios that leveraged 3,000 manual test cases and this was a big achievement for the customer to save the regression time and resources.
    • It is fast to automate SAP projects
    • Improved development cycle and nowadays customers are expecting "lights off" automation. We have scheduled lights off automation mode through Worksoft Certify.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Gatling
    • Scripting with user interface.
    • More reports.
    • Recording user path.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Worksoft
    • Worksoft Certify solution could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly
    • Test Data Management - No testing system will work with bad or interpreted data
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Gatling
    Our tests are only run via an integration platform (Jenkins), and only the results are analysed using Gatling reports. The difficulty lies in maintaining the Scala scripts, which must keep pace with changes in the application over time. New use cases must be thoroughly documented for testers who are not directly involved in development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Worksoft
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Gatling
    Gatling can only be used for high-load tests with a paid license and only for tests with a reduced graphical user interface (GUI). Unlike OctoPerf, NeoLoad, or LoadRunner, we are not limited to a fixed number of users per license. Compared with JMeter, Gatling is less resource-intensive and therefore does not require an extensive test infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Worksoft
    SAP TAO is only alternate tool I would suggest.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Gatling
    • Re use existing use case.
    • Difficult to add other load generator.
    • Cost reduction for simple tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Worksoft
    • Positive: End to End business process validation and Fast Test development
    • Licenses issues should be minimized
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots