Ghost vs. ID:webArchive

It is well suited for distributed writing and publishing with a subscription component.and well suited for simultaneous deployment to email and the web.

Its pricing for a very small group (3 or more) tends to the expensive and login across multiple different devices can be aggravating.

Incentivized

• Creating a newsletter for web and email simultaneously
• Allowing for paid subscriptions
• Allowing content to be segmented by subscription type
• Allows content to be segmented by medium
• Good analytics across various output medium

Incentivized

• They wysiwig editor is missing critical functions like superscript and subscript
• The markdown complement has those features but it doesn’t integrate well with the wysiwig editor
• Footnoting is hard to do

Incentivized

Flexible, competent and easy to use

Incentivized

It is simpler, headless, faster than WordPress. The core functionality is focused on subscription membership which is a bloated add on for WordPress. The simplicity has a cost as WordPress, while complicated, offers more expansion opportunities.

Incentivized

• Our business is totally built around this product
• It has allowed us to easily and quickly scale our free and our paywalled content experiments

Incentivized