GNU Make vs. JFrog Artifactory

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GNU Make
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
GNU Make is an open source and free build automation tool.N/A
JFrog Artifactory
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
JFrog Artifactory is a software repository management solution for enterprises available on-premise or from the cloud, presented as a single solution for housing and managing all the artifacts, binaries, packages, files, containers, and components for use throughout the software supply chain. JFrog Artifactory serves as a central hub for DevOps, integrating with tools and processes to improve automation, increase integrity, and incorporate best practices along the way.
$150
per month
Pricing
GNU MakeJFrog Artifactory
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pro
$150
per month unlimited users
Enterprise X
$750
per month unlimited users
Pro
$3,500
per year
Pro X
$21,500
per year
Enterprise X
$43,500
per year
Enterprise+
Custom Pricing
Enterprise+
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GNU MakeJFrog Artifactory
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
GNU MakeJFrog Artifactory
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GNU MakeJFrog Artifactory
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(2 ratings)
8.4
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
7.1
(2 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
GNU MakeJFrog Artifactory
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
GNU Make is a great tool for simple builds where language-specific options are not available, or to provide shortcuts for common commands (e.g., "make build" as shorthand for "go build ..." with a bunch of flags). However, it is complementary to other build systems. It does not replace them, which is perhaps one of its greatest strengths as well (works with existing ecosystem instead of trying to do everything). GMU Make it simple to get started with, and the philosophy of understanding how sources map to outputs, as well as the dependency graph, are beneficial.
Read full review
JFrog
It works at scale and a large number of accessible pipelines for searching, repository updates and indexing will become easier. JFrog provides end-to-end solutions for all DevOps needs. With this, Jfrog Artifactory specifically implements the management of highly available repositories, with a smooth interface and integration with all the main CI tools on the market.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Performance and accuracy of cross-module dependencies.
  • Simple to write and easy to understand.
Read full review
JFrog
  • Artifactory Management acting as a repository manager of docker images, application and component dependencies
  • Automate pipelines and thereby releasing changes faster
  • Supports high availability and scalability with multi site replication
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • No dependency management tools (but there are no cross-platform tools of this type anyway)
  • Tedious to do cross-compilation (Debug & Release builds, 32- and 64-bit builds, x86/ARM builds)
Read full review
JFrog
  • We can always use support for more different types of packages in Artifactory.
  • We also would like to see the Artifactory X-Ray produce continue to mature.
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
JFrog
The main problem that seems intractable is getting the checksum of the artifact. Managing container artifacts is a game changer for us during project execution, as the container artifact type exposes all base image and Docker file steps. This makes debugging or analysis easier. Jfrog Artifactory provides promotion feature and can automated from one environment repo to another environment repo before the deployment occurs.
Read full review
Support Rating
Open Source
In general, it is fair to say the support is sufficient although we do not deal with support directly. There are a lot of forum people chiming in with suggestions or recommendations of particular usage or issues we run into. Since it is open software, patch and fixes will be available from time to time. A lot of information is available in the web now for knowing GNU Make from learning, example, teaching, etc.
Read full review
JFrog
Support tickets take days to respond. The most basic of questions that should be knocked out in a few hours don't get answers for days. Tickets are also closed without resolution.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
I'm a full-stack developer that has used various build tools, including Maven, Gradle, and NPM/yarn. For our C projects, I also investigated CMake and Ninja, but they seemed more difficult to learn and more tedious to work with. GNU Make is a single binary that can be easily downloaded, even for Windows under MingW32, is straightforward to learn, and works pretty well despite its age.
Read full review
JFrog
JFrog Artifactory has a much more friendly GUI, making package exploration less of a chore to do. Other than that, their features are pretty much comparable to each other. Both support multiple types of packages; both have API that can integrate well with CI/CD pipelines.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Streamline the build based on a lot of existing component being done, reusable.
  • Commonly understandable, therefore, rampup effort is small.
Read full review
JFrog
  • So many times it happens at the time of dependency resolution some of the servers are down e.g NPM, Maven central, PiPy in that cause our builds starts failing. By proxying these repositories with JFrog this is never happened again.
  • It reduced the additional cost of container image registry and management effort.
  • Support of integration with Build, Monitoring, and CI tools resulted in smooth automation and management.
Read full review
ScreenShots