TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GoCD

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AGoCD, from ThoughtWorks in Chicago, is an application lifecycle management and development tool.N/A

    Rapise

    Score8 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Rapise is a software testing platform that allows users to regression test web, desktop and mobile applications. Some key features include: Playback of Tests, Test Script Editing and Data Driven Testing.

    $324

    per month (1 license)

    Pricing
    GoCDRapise
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GoCDRapise
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Discount available for annual billing (up to 10%).
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    GoCDRapise
    Small Businesses
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GoCDRapise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GoCDRapise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ThoughtWorks
    Previously, our team used Jenkins. However, since it's a shared deployment resource we don't have admin access. We tried GoCD as it's open source and we really like. We set up our deployment pipeline to run whenever codes are merged to master, run the unit test and revert back if it doesn't pass. Once it's deployed to the staging environment, we can simply do 1-click to deploy the appropriate version to production. We use this to deploy to an on-prem server and also AWS. Some deployment pipelines use custom Powershell script for.Net application, some others use Bash script to execute the docker push and cloud formation template to build elastic beanstalk.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inflectra Corporation
    The appropriate scenario to use Rapise is when we have a project that is considered from medium onwards, since Rapise will help us to define, develop and implement the testing phase in a reliable and efficient way. Also with Rapise we will not have to worry about the platform that we are using since it has great versatility and flexibility.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ThoughtWorks
    • Pipeline-as-Code works really well. All our pipelines are defined in yml files, which are checked into SCM.
    • The ability to link multiple pipelines together is really cool. Later pipelines can declare a dependency to pick up the build artifacts of earlier ones.
    • Agents definition is really great. We can define multiple different kinds of environments to best suit our diverse build systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inflectra Corporation
    • Simple recording front-end and easily captures UI objects for later interaction
    • Flexible programming interface provides a multitude of manners in which to interact with learned UI objects
    • Javascript based IDE is easy to learn
    Read full review
    Cons
    ThoughtWorks
    • UI can be improved
    • Location for settings can be re-arranged
    • API for setting up pipeline
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inflectra Corporation
    • For tests that require specific approaches it is necessary to have advanced knowledge of programming in javascrip, which sometimes the QA team does not have experience
    • Sometimes I have noticed that when using object dragging errors occur intermittently
    • The integration with some tools (Dynamics) is only with the basic functions from my point of view
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    ThoughtWorks
    GoCD is easier to setup, but harder to customize at runtime. There's no way to trigger a pipeline with custom parameters.
    Jenkins is more flexible at runtime. You can define multiple user-provided parameters so when user needs to trigger a build, there's a form for him/her to input the parameters.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inflectra Corporation
    Mmuch better from a flexibility perspective
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ThoughtWorks
    • ROI has been good since it's open source
    • Settings.xml need to be backed up periodically. It contains all the settings for your pipelines! We accidentally deleted before and we have to restore and re-create several missing pipelines
    • More straight forward use of API and allows filtering e.g., pull all pipelines triggered after this date
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Inflectra Corporation
    • The primary objective of the institution is a service to the public, so everything that improves response times to the public helps us to achieve it.
    • As a department in charge of the development of systems and applications, our objective is fulfilled by delivering quality products and tools such as Rapise help us greatly
    • The return on investment can be more than justified by fulfilling the primary objectives
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Rapise Screenshots

    Screenshot of the testing dashboardScreenshot of the integrated testing environmentScreenshot of the reporting interface