GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued vs. Google App Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | Score7.1 out of 10 | N/A | GoDaddy supported container management and container-as-a-service products, including (since 2016) ElasticHosts and Springs.io (e.g. Elastic Containers), are discontinued under those brands as of June 2020. However, GoDaddy development services, SDKs, and other projects are now hosted at GoDaddy Engineering and some are available open source. | N/A |
Google App Engine | Score8.4 out of 10 | N/A | Google App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages. | $0.05 Per Hour Per Instance |
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | Google App Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Springs.io is unlike other cloud hosting providers. Our reactive servers dynamically resize based on demand, and you only pay for your consumption, not your provisioning. This means you can save money and not sacrifice performance. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | Google App Engine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.6 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SUSE Rancher Score9.4 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.3 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.4 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.0 |
| GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued | Google App Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued Screenshots |




