Goodworld is a social impact platform for companies and nonprofits. Users can launch, manage, and measure CSR and ESG programs with tools for purpose-driven business. The Goodworld social impact platform engages employees and customers with the causes they care about. Through donations, volunteering and impact rewards, people can take action on social justice, climate change, education, mental health and other important issues in support of over 1.7 million…
Director, West Michigan in Marketing at Easter Seals Michigan (Non-profit Organization Management, 501-1000 employees)
Chose Goodworld
We are a development team of about 8 people, located in different areas. We liked Goodworld because it was easy to use for all of us, each being in charge of our own event, but using the same information. It has a dashboard that will show overall numbers and statistics.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Goodworld
Goodworld was the most user-friendly and streamlined platform with all the fundraising tools we were looking for PLUS CSR capabilities. The landing pages and campaigns integrated seamlessly with our website and have made it easier than ever to empower our Board, Corporate …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Senior Director, Corporate Engagement in Product Management at CHC: Creating Healthier Communities (Philanthropy, 11-50 employees)
Chose Goodworld
Goodworld is by far the more superior product because it lets us be more proactive in implementing customized giving experiences, has a more powerful dashboard, and streamlines the giving process in a more modern interface. That's just the technology aspect - their team makes …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Goodworld
When the pandemic hit, and we needed to move our annual fundraiser from in-person to online, our donor CRM at the time didn't offer the ability to easily create an aesthetically pleasing online campaign without additional HTML and design knowledge. We saw another organization …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Executive Director at Hollywood Police Activities League (Non-profit Organization Management, 1-10 employees)
Chose Goodworld
The biggest incentive for using Goodworld as opposed to other platforms is truly ease of use and branding ability. While the other platforms may have extra bells and whistles on the database management compared to Goodworld's current setup, These other programs make it …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Executive Director in Corporate at Ovations for the Cure (Non-profit Organization Management, 1-10 employees)
Chose Goodworld
We were not pleased with the customer support and ease of setting up events with Click and Pledge. Our donors are often called to make donations over the phone rather than use the C&P platform.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Goodworld
Givelively had less functionality, and Mobile Cause seemed harder to navigate and more expensive but both seem fine
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As an organization, we have several different types of fundraising events. This product allows us to have individual pages or a full event page. It's pretty straightforward, even for our donor fundraisers. They can create their own individual fundraising pages to share through social media or email. Their help and support are wonderful!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Ease of creating a branded landing page, Day 1 we were able to set up our main donation page on our website, that looked great, was easy to copy links, and with the page or event set up, it's easy to edit and update.
I don’t really have any dislikes. The only time I have trouble with something is creating the appropriate graphics that work across all devices, especially mobile devices. It can be a bit cumbersome.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Goodworld is by far the more superior product because it lets us be more proactive in implementing customized giving experiences, has a more powerful dashboard, and streamlines the giving process in a more modern interface. That's just the technology aspect - their team makes the experience even better!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
