Google Cloud Datastore vs. Riak

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Datastore
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL "schemaless" database as a service, supporting diverse data types. The database is managed; Google manages sharding and replication and prices according to storage and activity.N/A
Riak
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Riak is a NoSQL database from Basho Technologies in Bellevue, Washington.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud DatastoreRiak
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud DatastoreRiak
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud DatastoreRiak
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud Datastore
Chose Google Cloud Datastore
As stated before, we eventually chose Google Cloud Datastore because we were already leveraging other Google Cloud services like VMs, Cloud Runs, logging etc. MySQL and MongoDB were possible alternatives, but we preferred to lock in to the Google ecosystem.
Chose Google Cloud Datastore
We selected Google Cloud Datastore as one of our candidates for our NoSQL data is because it is provided by Google Cloud, which fits our needs. Most of our infrastructure is on Google Cloud, so when we think about the NoSQL database, the first thing we thought about is Google …
Chose Google Cloud Datastore
If deploying an application in Google Cloud Platform, using Google Cloud Datastore is a no brainer because of the simplicity of setup. Other options would require more setup and configuration, and do not come with the same level of guaranteed uptime as Google Cloud Datastore. …
Riak
Chose Riak
MongoDB seems to have copied a lot of functionality from Riak. This may be because MongoDB hired a number of former Basho engineers when Basho went bankrupt. That said, the new functions added to Riak after it became open source have successfully differentiated itself from …
Chose Riak
Every database has positives and negatives. Redis is very good at set operations, but not as good at executing fast queries. MongoDB is a much cheaper data store than Riak, but not as highly available and scalable. Searching Riak is also faster than searching MongoDB or …
Chose Riak
Because of the RESTful HTTP interface, the consistency model, and because of the catalog-driven data model, Riak was an easy win over Redis and Memcached.
Chose Riak
At the time I worked on the project those were the three competing technologies I evaluated. Couchbase didn't have memcache integrated at the time. Riak was by far the easiest to set up, and it's linking capability struck the right balance of having just enough relational …
Chose Riak
Riak is a key/value pair store which is great for certain use cases. For our use case, the ability to search is an extremely useful feature. Apache Cassandra can provide this while Riak cannot. Also again for our use case, the ability to delete is critical as we strive to …
Features
Google Cloud DatastoreRiak
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Datastore
8.4
Ratings
2% below category average
Riak
-
Ratings
Performance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud DatastoreRiak
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Redis Software
Redis Software
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud DatastoreRiak
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud DatastoreRiak
Likelihood to Recommend
If you want a serverless NoSQL database, no matter it is for personal use, or for company use, Google Cloud Datastore should be on top of your list, especially if you are using Google Cloud as your primary cloud platform. It integrates with all services in the Google Cloud platform.
Read full review
Riak is very good if you need a resilient data store that can handle large amounts of documents very fast. If you have 1,000,000 documents and need to execute complex queries, it is great. Riak's SOLR engine is fast, however if you have extremely high amount of queries in a very limited time range, it can fail in a bad way.
Read full review
Pros
  • Automatically handles shards and replication.
  • Schema-less & NoSQL.
  • Fully managed.
Read full review
  • Reliability -- we rarely have to do anything to maintain our Riak instance. It is just online and available for whatever we throw at it.
  • The Riak Python client is an excellent tool and handles parallel writes/reads very well
  • There is a large and very receptive community or Riak users and developers who seem to be able to help with most technical questions that have arisen.
Read full review
Cons
  • It is hosted on GCP, which makes it harder if your company have multi-cloud strategy.
  • When you want to migrate to other cloud providers, there can be a caveat.
Read full review
  • Missing a free text search function
  • More security work
  • Multi-tenant reporting
  • More types of index optimised for different structures
  • Automating repairs especially after unclean shutdowns
  • WebDAV/Samba shares for Riak CS
  • Implementing the SQL queries from Riak TS in Riak KV
  • Settable replication bandwidth caps
  • Safemode start up after failure
  • More client integrations
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
For the amount of use we're getting from Google Cloud Datastore, switching to any other platform would have more cost with little gain. Not having to manage and maintain Google Cloud Datastore for over 4 years has allowed our teams to work on other things. The price is so low that almost any other option for our needs would be far more expensive in time and money.
Read full review
Riak works great for our use case but the fact that deletes seem to resurrect is a real issue for us. Unless we can get this solved, we'll continue to look at other products to see if our use case fits. Otherwise Riak is a great product and it fits our use case 95%. We have found work arounds to the remaining 5%.
Read full review
Usability
The simple implementation, together with the Google Cloud dashboard that allows data inspection, editing and querying, makes Google Cloud Datastore a comprehensive choice when it comes to NoSQL databases.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Despite Basho going bankrupt and the project becoming fully open-source, community support is reasonably good, albeit a little slow at times. Paid enterprise-grade support is also available from former Basho engineers but the same company also contributes to the community support for free for basic questions or specific knowledge areas.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
As stated before, we eventually chose Google Cloud Datastore because we were already leveraging other Google Cloud services like VMs, Cloud Runs, logging etc. MySQL and MongoDB were possible alternatives, but we preferred to lock in to the Google ecosystem.
Read full review
MongoDB seems to have copied a lot of functionality from Riak. This may be because MongoDB hired a number of former Basho engineers when Basho went bankrupt. That said, the new functions added to Riak after it became open source have successfully differentiated itself from MongoDB.
Amazon S3 is a nice tool but when you are at significant scale with regionally specific data (joys of GDPR), it's much easier to keep it in house and Riak CS lets you do exactly that. All you need to do is point your application at Riak CS instead of Amazon S3 and it just works as if nothing has changed.
When we evaluated against Cassandra, we found the tools available did not match our needs at the time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It solves our NoSQL database problem.
  • It it highly scalable and available to meets our needs.
Read full review
  • Riak's simple API and simple management model made it a no brainer when it came to adopting it as a technology for the team.
Read full review
ScreenShots