Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs. Oracle SOA Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Google offers Cloud Pub/Sub, a managed message oriented middleware supporting many-to-many asynchronous messaging between applications.N/A
Oracle SOA Suite
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The rapid adoption of cloud-based applications by the enterprise, combined with organizations’ desire to integrate applications with mobile technologies, is dramatically increasing application integration complexity. Oracle SOA Suite 12c, the latest version of the company's unified application integration and SOA solution, offers a simplified cloud, mobile, on-premises and Internet of Things (IoT) integration capabilities within a single platform.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud Pub/SubOracle SOA Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud Pub/SubOracle SOA Suite
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud Pub/SubOracle SOA Suite
Considered Both Products
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Chose Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub is a managed service compared to Apache Kafka.

Simple Queue Service (SQS) is an Amazon managed service that supports similar functionality as compared to Google Cloud Pub/Sub. However, we selected Google Cloud Pub/Sub as all other services in our platform …
Chose Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Kafka looks like and ordered queue, there no deliver backoff, so if a message has a problem, it doesn't advance to the next one. Google Cloud Pub/Sub looks like more a SET of messages, and kafka like a LIST. In kafka a same message will repeat instantaneously while it is being …
Chose Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Having used Amazon Web Services SNS & SQS I can say that even if the latter may offer more features, Google Cloud Pub/Sub is easier to use. On the other hand, usage of SNS & SQS as well as documentation and troubleshooting is easier with the AWS solution.
Since we are not using …
Chose Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub as a managed service is significantly more easy to use than a self managed Kafka cluster. As our software was already on GCP it was a no-brainer to use Pub/Sub due to the high level of integration and ease of use with other Google Cloud Platform services.
Chose Google Cloud Pub/Sub
  • Easy to setup Publisher, Subscribers and Message Queue service
  • More Reliable and Easy Scalable with Google Managed services
  • Easily integrated with most of the data sources we typically use for Data Storage and Analysis
Chose Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Amazon SQS has no integration with google play billing whereas Google Cloud Pub/Sub had native integration with google cloud billing, Play billing.
Chose Google Cloud Pub/Sub
We considered several messaging platforms including Kafka and Kinesis but both would have required more developer work and didn't integrate as nicely with our ecosystem. RabbitMQ is another messaging platform I've researched and prototyped on; it also would have required more …
Chose Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Compute Engine is not a direct competitor, but in fact, works well coupled with Pub/Sub.
Oracle SOA Suite
Chose Oracle SOA Suite
Oracle being the market leader and has a lot of compatibilities with sources like SOA projects, Oracle database and other JMS feeds.
Chose Oracle SOA Suite
Oracle Database, Oracle Access Management, Oracle Business Activity Monitoring, Oracle Application Testing Suite, Oracle BPM Suite, Oracle BI Foundation Suite, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Oracle Data Integrator, Oracle Service Cloud, Oracle Customer Care and Billing and …
Chose Oracle SOA Suite
I used Service Bus while developing SOA Suite composites. It makes development easier. Calls to vendors' web services for instance are done easily. Each vendor has its own protocol and development platform. Without Oracle Service Bus we would have had to thought on how to reach …
Chose Oracle SOA Suite
When we wanted an enterprise service bus, the AquaLogic Service bus was our first choice and it had very stable features. It was later bought by Oracle and we have used it for several years. Snaplogic and Mule ESB are upcoming and very promising. Snaplogic is completely born in …
Chose Oracle SOA Suite
I worked on various other products like OSB at a various engagement at customer end and I found OSB is lightweight and effective for virtualization.
Chose Oracle SOA Suite
Mule ESB is an open source tool and would definitely cost less, however is not as sophisticated a product for the business functionality we need at US Cellular.. I have reviewed IBM WebSphere message broker, is very cumbersome and not very user friendly. Despite some of the …
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud Pub/SubOracle SOA Suite
Small Businesses
AWS IoT Core
AWS IoT Core
Score 9.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM DataPower Gateway
IBM DataPower Gateway
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud Pub/SubOracle SOA Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud Pub/SubOracle SOA Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Using Google Cloud Pub/Sub will mainly depend on the cloud platform used. Our client didn't choose GCP for Google Cloud Pub/Sub, if we went with AWS we would be using SNS/SQS (obviously). However, Google Cloud Pub/Sub is a better solution in the GCP services compared to self-managed solutions such as RabbitMQ for instance (it is managed by GCP and integrates with GCP solutions).
Read full review
In comparison to Open source products like Apache Camel and Mule ESB, Oracle ESB is more robust and offers better enterprise capabilities. However, the licensing costs are fairly prohibitive and are preventing widespread product adoption. At our university, we had already purchased the Oracle Campus Solutions ERP suite and hence had little problems integrating their OSB as well.
Read full review
Pros
  • A hands-off approach to publishing messages and subscribing to topics.
  • Easy to use APIs.
  • Useful, simple UI on cloud console to send messages for debugging, etc.
Read full review
  • It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or Web services through different protocols.
  • It helps in building reusable, well-defined services.
Read full review
Cons
  • Allow write and read of messages more than 10 MB
  • Support rate at which HTTP endpoints are triggered to reduce scale requirements on downstream services
  • Support replay of messages
Read full review
  • Service implementation is not agile like microservices.
  • The architecture is so complex and could result in higher latency with so many layers to traverse.
  • Deployment of multiple web services in one session
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It serves all of our purposes in the most transparent way I can imagine, after seeing other message queueing providers, I can only attest to its quality.
Read full review
We have had not many issues with Oracle Service Bus and it's very stable for our requirements. It's highly available and helps us implement Tier1 applications on it.
Read full review
Usability
It is easy to create Google Cloud Pub/Sub topics from both Web Console and CLI commands.
Google Cloud Pub/Sub supports creation of one or more subscriptions.
By supporting a BigQuery Pub/Sub subscription to automatically write to a BigQuery table it simplifies development by avoiding implementation of a custom micro service for writes to BigQuery.
Read full review
It's an excellent enterprise service bus and has very stable features. We have been using it since 2008. We did hit into some issues. But, recreating the service helped fix many issues. Also, deployment to various environments was easy. Also, the plugin on Eclipse helps to build proxy and business services quick and easy.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I have never faced a single problem in 4 years.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
It's very fast, can be even better if you use protobuf.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
They have decent documentation, but you need to pay for support. We weren't able to answer all our questions with the documentation and didn't have time to setup support before we needed it so I can't give it a higher rating but I think it tends to be a bit slow unless you're a GCP enterprise support customer.
Read full review
We had some issues with MQ connectivity through OSB and our experience was poor with the support team. They do respond. But, it felt like we are ignored and we had bad support. We had to escalate and things used to get dragged for weeks before we get more quality questions on how to pursue investigation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
  • Easy to setup Publisher, Subscribers and Message Queue service
  • More Reliable and Easy Scalable with Google Managed services
  • Easily integrated with most of the data sources we typically use for Data Storage and Analysis
  • 10k Topics is a good enough number to build and deliver the business use cases
  • Asynchronous and fallback mechanisms are great to ensure parallel delivery of the messages
Read full review
Mule ESB is an open source tool and would definitely cost less, however is not as sophisticated a product for the business functionality we need at US Cellular.. I have reviewed IBM WebSphere Message Broker, is very cumbersome and not very user friendly. Despite some of the license cost concerns, Oracle Service Bus stands out as an ideal Enterprise Service Bus solution at US Cellular
Read full review
Scalability
You can just plug in consumers at will and it will respond, there's no need for further configuration or introducing new concepts. You have a queue, if it's slow, you plug in more consumers to process more messages: simple as that.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Pub/Sub has helped avoid data loss improving our customer value prop.
  • Pub/Sub has reduced development time that would otherwise be needed to build a highly scalable queue.
Read full review
  • We were able to increase efficiency in our lead generation process.
  • Improved data driven decisions.
  • Reduction in processing time by aligning resources on time.
Read full review
ScreenShots