Google Cloud Run vs. Syself

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Run
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Run enables users to build and deploy scalable containerized apps written in any language (including Go, Python, Java, Node.js, .NET, and Ruby) on a fully managed platform. Cloud Run can be paired with other container ecosystem tools, including Google's Cloud Build, Cloud Code, Artifact Registry, and Docker. And it features out-of-the-box integration with Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Error Reporting to ensure the health of an application.N/A
Syself
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Syself offers a simplified Kubernetes Management Platform, used to build reliable environments with 100% reproducibility in just a few steps, no need for in-house experts. With its roots in open-source, Syself states they maintain projects used by hundreds of organizations, running thousands of servers daily on cloud infrastructure. The Syself Kubernetes Platform manages the entire lifecycle of clusters, from creation to scaling and upgrades. Key features: • Ease of use:…
$299
per month
Pricing
Google Cloud RunSyself
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud RunSyself
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Google Cloud RunSyself
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Run
7.3
17 Ratings
10% below category average
Syself
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation8.217 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration7.716 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management2.71 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization8.417 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools7.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks8.316 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.117 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud RunSyself
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud RunSyself
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud RunSyself
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Microservices and RestFul API application as it is fast and reliant. Seamless integration with event triggers such as pubsub or event arc, so you can easily integrate that with usecases with file uploads, database changes, etc. Basically great with short-lived tasks, if however, you have long-running processses, Cloud Run might not be idle for this. For example if you have a long running data processing task, other solutions such as kubeflow pipelines or dataflow are more suited for this kind of tasks. Cloud Run is also stateless, so if you need memory, you will have to connect an external database.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Pros
Google
  • Auto scaling is the best one
  • provide direct VPC connectivity and rigid network
  • Cloud SQL and Pub/Sub services
  • Handling latency issues
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Cons
Google
  • The UI can be made simpler. Currently the UI is bloated and it takes time to find out what you want
  • More integrations with container registry providers (ECR, dockerhub)
  • Better permissions UX. Currently GCP requires service accounts to be used with cloud products, the experience adding/removing permissions is difficult to navigate
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Google
We definitely need to renew it because we dont own our own infrastructure and storage and we are happy with Cloud Run features
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google
The UI/console is great... the documentation is top-notch for developers, but the CLI itself when you have to script around it is very complex and easy to forget some options... the downside of a generic command line client.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Google
Not seen any major issues when we run applications its good
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Performance
Google
Initially we felt slow but slowly it picked up and easy to manage
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Google
I was involved in the initial implementation setup, Its easy with the given documentaiton we can do ourself. Not that critical
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
AWS Lambda supports code zip package, enabling lower cold start time. Also, AWS Lambda pricing is much simpler, easier to understand.
Other than that, the 2 products are very similar, including the Docker image support: the image must be built based on proprietary base image.
Obviously, if your other services are running in GCP, then Google Cloud Run is your only choice for tight integration, & private networking.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Google
Not part of purchase.
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Google
It has good auto scale feature and reliable also
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Google
We have very good support when needed
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Google
  • Built in support for auto scaling helps reduce operational overhead
  • Any application performance issues can be addressed quickly by allocating more resources while a proper fix can be planned and rolled out later
  • Using Google Cloud Run enables development of microservices which provides granular control for scaling critical services in the platform
Read full review
Syself
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots