Google Cloud SQL vs. IBM Cloud Functions
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Cloud SQL | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud SQL is a database-as-a-service (DBaaS) with the capability and functionality of MySQL. | $0 per core hour |
IBM Cloud Functions | Score6.5 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud Functions is a PaaS platform based on Apache OpenWhisk. With it, developers write code (“actions”) that respond to external events. Actions are hosted, executed, and scaled on demand based on the number of events coming in. No servers or infrastructure to provision and manage. | $0 per second of execution |
| Google Cloud SQL | IBM Cloud Functions | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pricing varies with editions, engine, and settings, including how much storage, memory, and CPU you provision. Cloud SQL offers per-second billing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud SQL | IBM Cloud Functions | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 32 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 32 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 32 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 24 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 29 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Google Cloud SQL | IBM Cloud Functions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Database-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud SQL | IBM Cloud Functions | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | MongoDB Atlas Score7.8 out of 10 | AWS Lambda Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Azure Database Score8.8 out of 10 | AWS Lambda Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google BigQuery Score8.8 out of 10 | AWS Lambda Score8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Cloud SQL | IBM Cloud Functions | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.4 | 3.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 8.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.3 | - |
| Google Cloud SQL | IBM Cloud Functions | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Cloud SQL Screenshots |






