Google Cloud SQL

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Google Cloud SQL	Score 8.8 out of 10	N/A	Google Cloud SQL is a database-as-a-service (DBaaS) with the capability and functionality of MySQL.	$0 per core hour

Pricing

Google Cloud SQL

Editions & Modules

License - Express: $0
per core hour
License - Web: $0.01134
per core hour
Storage - for backups: $.08
per month per GB
HA Storage - for backups: $.08
per month per GB
Storage - HDD storage capacity: $.09
per month per GB
License - Standard: $0.13
per core hour
Storage - SSD storage capacity: $.17
per month per GB
HA Storage - HDD storage capacity: $.18
per month per GB
HA Storage - SSD storage capacity: $.34
per month per GB
License - Enterprise: $0.47
per core hour
Memory: $5.11
per month per GB
HA Memory: $10.22
per month per GB
vCPUs: $30.15
per month per vCPU
HA vCPUs: $60.30
per month per vCPU

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud SQL
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

Pricing varies with editions, engine, and settings, including how much storage, memory, and CPU you provision. Cloud SQL offers per-second billing.

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Community Pulse
	Google Cloud SQL
Considered Both Products	Google Cloud SQL Verified User Team Lead Chose Google Cloud SQL DigitalOcean Managed database is relatively less costly compared to Google Cloud SQL database. Google Cloud SQL service is well integrated with other Google Cloud Platform services such as IAM which enables fine grain access to team members. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Employee Chose Google Cloud SQL Simple to implement as SaaS. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Google Cloud SQL I've used Supabase and can say that Google Cloud SQL is a lot more hands off. They just run an instance for you and don't do much more than that. Which is exactly what we wanted. If you want something that is truly fully managed and abstracted then I guess that would be a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Consultant Chose Google Cloud SQL Kind of similar features provided against RDS. Used this because of transactional db Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Google Cloud SQL Google's solution for database is, at least for our team, easier to implement and maintain than Amazon's offer. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Vice-President Chose Google Cloud SQL Given this is a hosted solution, database a service it helps in removing the effort of maintaining these databases manually. Eases out the pain of upgrading, applying security patches and keeping things running without having to worry about missed changes. The database can be … Incentivized Helpful? Isidro Moran Director, Engineering Chose Google Cloud SQL In our experience, we were down for almost a day, because Database Engineers at Rackspace weren't able to understand or provide a solution, and when they did, they had to recreate the database from the scratch. On a server, this is time consuming. When we faced a similar … Incentivized Helpful? Satyam Pandey Associate software developer Chose Google Cloud SQL As I used Google Cloud SQL it's performance is very good and it's ui ux is as per the user demand. Apart from it the backend is very strong which makes it more usable tools as it gives or run the query in very minimal time. Yes there has to be some work on security and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Google Cloud SQL Actually Google Cloud SQL is similar to them, the difference is which engine each supports e.g. there's no managed Oracle DB in Google Cloud SQL but as long as you don't need Oracle, Google Cloud SQL should suffice and give you great user experience and performance. You also … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Google Cloud SQL Google Cloud SQL ended up being less expensive, have a greater support team and offer a much better interface Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Google Cloud SQL I 100% prefer Google Cloud SQL over Amazon Aurora in terms of ease of use and clarity in terms of understanding how the autoscaling is going to work. Connecting to the database directly is also much more straightforward. Incentivized Helpful? Priyanshu Rastogi Senior Backend developer Chose Google Cloud SQL Setting up or migrating Google Cloud SQL is easy as compared to AWS. It has a good monitoring and logging mechanism and a good user interface which makes it easy to navigate.It also has a pay as you go pricing which makes it easier to reduce cost. Google Cloud SQL offers … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Google Cloud SQL BigQuery is a great analytical database and is generally our first choice for large analytical workloads. While its performance and throughput far outperforms Google Cloud SQL but it supports a far limited dialets of SQL. Generally a significant rewrite will be needed for … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Google Cloud SQL Google SQL was great as a first SQL provision. It quickly enabled the apps to be built and scaled as needed for a while. It was robust and adaptable as needed and easy to export as needed when ready, depending on growth. Cost-wise, it's a good choice and requires little … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Employee Chose Google Cloud SQL Unlike other products, Google Cloud SQL has very flexible features that allow it to be selected for a free trial account so that the product can be analyzed and tested before purchasing it. Integration capabilities with most of the web services tools are easier regarding Google … Incentivized Helpful? SS Shireen Shahab Web Developer Chose Google Cloud SQL When comparing cost, Google Cloud SQL typically offers a more straightforward and versatile plan than Azure SQL Database. Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL is a serverless solution provided by Google Cloud SQL that automatically modifies resources according to workload. For customers … Helpful? Alok Pabalkar Co-Founder & CTO Chose Google Cloud SQL - AWS RDS and Aurora is a just a notch above Google Cloud SQL as it provide boost in performance when required - Google Cloud SQL Mysql Engine is Cloud based and better than native Mysql as it provides management of the server out of box - Compared to a MongoDB it has a low … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User C-Level Executive Chose Google Cloud SQL The Google Cloud SQL offering fits into our development stack and was a clean replacement for our MySQL database. If we had been using SQL Server instead, then the offering from Azure would have made more sense. I have used both in the past and both work well, with GCP being … Incentivized Helpful? Deepansh Daga Enterprise Architect Chose Google Cloud SQL I have used only Google Cloud SQL so far. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Google Cloud SQL At first, we choose Google Cloud SQL only for demo purposes. It is so easy to set up and It is fully managed. we have worked with Azure SQL as well but Google SQL is more simple to use and It fully secure, reliable, provides high availability, and very Low Latency. Helpful? Niloofar Keshvari Nia IT Operations and Support Specialist Chose Google Cloud SQL Easier learning, simple features and settings with a very user-friendly application environment and flexible prices make Google Cloud [SQL] a pioneering option over competitors Incentivized Helpful? Ashok Kalra Head - Analytics and Database Chose Google Cloud SQL IBM DB2 AWS RDS Azure SQL Database Incentivized Helpful? Cameron Gable Software Engineer Chose Google Cloud SQL We use the MySQL managed database that Cloud SQL offers, and it has all of the functionality of on-prem MySQL, plus it is managed. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Google Cloud SQL

Database-as-a-Service

Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
	Google Cloud SQL 8.8 33 Ratings 2% above category average
Automatic software patching	9.612 Ratings
Database scalability	8.633 Ratings
Automated backups	9.033 Ratings
Database security provisions	8.433 Ratings
Monitoring and metrics	8.432 Ratings
Automatic host deployment	9.012 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Google Cloud SQL
Small Businesses	IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises	IBM Cloudant Score 7.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Google Cloud SQL
Likelihood to Recommend	8.5 (33 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.1 (2 ratings)
Usability	8.4 (15 ratings)
Support Rating	9.1 (5 ratings)
Implementation Rating	9.1 (1 ratings)
Ease of integration	9.1 (11 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Google Cloud SQL
Likelihood to Recommend	Google Does what it promises well, for instance, as a sidecar for the main enterprise data warehouse. However, I would not recommend using it as the main data warehouse, particularly due to the heavy business logic, as other dedicated tools are more suitable for ensuring scalable operations in terms of change management and multi-developer adjustments. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Google It has a easily and user understandable interface which provides it every necessary feature to come up with. It's backend is very strong that can help us to run big quieres without any hesitation. It's integration with other tools are one of the powerful feature which makes it more suitable to use. Incentivized Satyam Pandey Associate software developer Read full review
Cons	Google Increasing support for more database engines may enable a wider range of application needs to be met. Implementing and updating cutting-edge security features on a constant basis. Streamlining and enhancing the tools for transferring data to Google Cloud SQL from on-premises databases or other cloud providers. SS Shireen Shahab Web Developer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Google It fits the current needs and bandwith of out lean organization. Incentivized ISIDRO MORAN Director, Engineering Read full review
Usability	Google As with other cloud tools, users must learn a new terminology to navigate the various tools and configurations, and understand Google Cloud's configuration structure to perform even the most basic operations. So the learning curve is quite steep, but after a few months, it gets easier to maintain. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Google GCP support in general requires a support agreement. For small organizations like us, this is not affordable or reasonable. It would help if Google had a support mechanism for smaller organizations. It was a steep learning curve for us because this was our first entry into the cloud database world. Better documentation also would have helped. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Google Unlike other products, Google Cloud SQL has very flexible features that allow it to be selected for a free trial account so that the product can be analyzed and tested before purchasing it. Integration capabilities with most of the web services tools are easier regarding Google Cloud SQL with its nature and support. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Google With managed database system, it has given us near 100% data availability It has also improved web layer experience with faster processing and authentication using database fields Google Cloud SQL also gels up well with Google Analytics and other analytics systems for us to join up different data points and process them for deeper dives and analysis Incentivized Ashok Kalra Head - Analytics and Database Read full review
ScreenShots	Google Cloud SQL Screenshots