Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) vs. Zscaler Private Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud has a network of 27 regions and 200+ countries and territories, boasting little to no downtime for its users. It is automatically configured or can be done by the user and allows you to bring your own IP addresses to reduce downtime caused by migration.
$0
per ingress traffic
Zscaler Private Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) is a ZTNA as a service, that takes a user- and application-centric approach to private application access. A cloud-delivered service, ZPA is built to ensure that only authorized users have access to specific private applications by creating secure segments of one between individual devices and apps.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Zscaler Private Access
Editions & Modules
egress traffic
$0 - 0.15
per GB
ingress traffic
$0
based on services that process ingress traffic: Load Balancers, Cloud NAT, Protocol forwarding.
Premium Tier (egress rates)
$0- $0.23
per month per GB of data delivered
Standard Tier (egress rates)
$0.045, $0.065, $0.085
per month per GB of data delivered: 150-500TB, 10-150TB, 0-10TB
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Zscaler Private Access
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Zscaler Private Access
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Zscaler Private Access
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
-
Ratings
Zscaler Private Access
10.0
1 Ratings
19% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
-
Ratings
Zscaler Private Access
10.0
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Zscaler Private Access
Small Businesses
Vultr
Vultr
Score 6.2 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Zscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(8 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)Zscaler Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
An effective pricing strategy is in place. Google Cloud VPC is the most secure since it runs on a private network and never contacts the public network. Google is well-known for its AI/ML and Kubernetes engines, both of which have a leg up on the competition. Google Cloud VPC's database services are yet to be improved.
Read full review
Zscaler
Well Suited: - Work from home scenario - While working with confidential data - While working with financial data - Office intranet Less Suited: - Reduces internet speed - If the user gets a password, can exit/close the app.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Can utilize one VPC to connect many regions without using the internet.
  • Unlike competitors, VPC can automatically build a virtual topology.
  • Configure private communication inside companies.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Access control for overall organization, follows the ZTNA model.
  • Better speed for remote users compared with legacy remote solutions.
  • Better visibility on ZScaler portal, thus better control from central space.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Sometimes the group settings tab lags a little
  • Although overall it's easy to use, some of the sections lack documentation
  • Routes section is very poorly implemented, requires a lot of digging to learn how to use
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Sometimes the interface crashes and I need to kill it and restart
  • It can unintentionally block some services like dropbox
  • I don't get a notification when I need to re-authenticate
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Google VPC and networking infrastructure is very matured and is built later after Amazon VPC. It made sure to address all the limitations faced by amazon VPC. Google Virtual private cloud is across regions while amazon VPC covers only one region but multiple zones. Google VPC is a global resource while AWS is a regional resource.
Read full review
Zscaler
Both are good but sometimes relationship and cost is the factor to decide the final vendor.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Using Google Cloud VPC cloud storage has saved us on infra budget and per TB storage cost
  • Using MySQL databases on Google Cloud VPC has improved the performance and cost of operation and maintenance
  • Better pricing model has improvement on operational cost and increased revenue
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Overall positive Impact.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) Screenshots

Screenshot of Google flow logs