TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Container Registry vs. Percona Operator

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Container Registry

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Container Registry is a place to manage Docker images, perform vulnerability analysis, and decide who can access what with fine-grained access control. Existing CI/CD integrations let users set up fully automated Docker pipelines.N/A

    Percona Operator

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AThe Percona Kubernetes Operator for Percona XtraDB Cluster or Percona Server for MongoDB automates the creation, alteration, or deletion of members in a Percona XtraDB Cluster or Percona Server for MongoDB environment. It can be used to instantiate a new Percona XtraDB Cluster or Percona Server for MongoDB replica set, or to scale an existing environment. The Operator contains all necessary Kubernetes settings to provide a proper and consistent Percona XtraDB Cluster or Percona Server for…N/A
    Pricing
    Google Container RegistryPercona Operator
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Container RegistryPercona Operator
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Free and open-source
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Google Container RegistryPercona Operator
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Google Container Registry and Percona Operator
    Feature
    Google Container Registry
    8.5
    1 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Percona Operator
    -
    Ratings
    Security and Isolation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Orchestration6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Container RegistryPercona Operator
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Container RegistryPercona Operator
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Container RegistryPercona Operator
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    As a Cloud Engineer while working on a migration project we used GCR and my experience of using it is actually good the reason behind this is: 1: GCR uses industry-standard encryption to protect your data.2: GCR offers data loss prevention features to help you prevent sensitive data from being leaked or exposed and last but not the least is GCR provides audit logging so you can track who has accessed your data and when, because of these reasons its my go to tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    Production ready, robust DB solution built for Kubernetes envs, we was able, for the first time, to ship production db workloads inside k8s. Be sure to check differences with "traditional" MySQL and other clustering solutions. Also be sure to match it with proper k8s storage solutions.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Object Immutability feature allows us to protect our code and backups from accidental or malicious changes.
    • Data loss prevention feature helps us to prevent sensitive data from being leaked or exposed.
    • GCR has support for machine learning which is in my opinion is best .
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    • Easy and fast deployment.
    • A reliable, fully automated, high-available db lifecycle management solution.
    • Exaustive documentation.
    • Production ready.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • The one area which i think GCR lacks is that it currently supports a limited number of file types
    • The major flaw a felt while working on it is it does not have feature of object versioning and object locking
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    • Some differences compared to "traditional" MySQL solution.
    • Had some hard times trying to use it combined with pre-existing techs like WordPress, Magento, etc.
    • The specific k8s environment features can have an impact on it, like the storage solutions offered by the cloud vendor.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Percona
    Easy and fast deployment. A reliable, fully automated, high-available db lifecycle management solution. It requires a bit of learning time for people new to operators ecosystem.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Percona
    Well documented, there was no need to contact support.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    It is very easy to integrate GCR with other services and I integrated GCR with GKE and Cloud Build. 1: While working on one project I created one pipeline pulls the app's Docker image from GCR and builds the app's Docker image. Deployed that apps image in GKE. 2: Ive stored the data in GCR and that data was being used by cloud Run applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    For a long time we struggled finding a viable solution to migrate our existing db workloads inside Kubernetes. Before "operators era" proper db workloads required manual management, of course that easily raised administrative overhead. Then the future started to be brighter with the introduction of operators and the "official" Oracle's MySQL Operator, then Presslab's one, finally Percona's operator. Compared to other operators, the last one allowed us to ship production db workloads inside k8s.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • As a DevOps Engineer , GCR has made a important contribution to my organisation because GCR can be used to store code and assets, which can help to reduce the development time for new projects.
    • Using GCR has bee­n a cost-effective solution for us since­ we only pay for the storage we­ actually utilise. This has resulted in significant savings on our cloud storage­ expenses.
    • We trust GCR be­cause they prioritise the­ security of our data by utilising industry-standard encryption. This assurance brings us pe­ace of mind, as we know our information is protecte­d.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Percona
    • It allowed us to use k8s on our entire infrastructure.
    • Decreased administrative overhead around our db services.
    • As it is an open source technology, it cut down our db pricings.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots