Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them. | N/A |
Veracode | Score8.5 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Priced by company size | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 17 Answers | 92% Would buy again 128 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | 96% Delivers good value for the price 90 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | 95% Happy with the feature set 132 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 76 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | 86% Implementation went as expected 101 Answers | |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Veracode | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Checkmarx Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.3 |
| Usability | 7.6 | 5.5 |
| Availability | - | 7.3 |
| Performance | - | 2.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.5 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.4 |
| Product Scalability | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots | Veracode Screenshots |











