RSMeans data, from Gordian (formerly Costworks) is a construction and estimation software offering acquired by the Gordian Group in 2014. It includes cost books and construction project estimating software tools.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
7.8
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
7.49 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
24% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
2.12 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Production Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks) and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Well Suited: Construction cost estimates for new larger projects where the construction will start within the next 6-9 months. Budgetary estimates for future buildings through its square foot models. Not Well Suited: Not accurate enough on small projects where labor, travel to sites, and OH&P are a higher percentage of unit costs than on larger projects where these costs are spread out across more units.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
CostWorks is very good at generating quick and valid estimates for standardized facilities such as office buildings, schools, etc. It allows you to validate other cost estimates at the UniFormat level when doing an estimate validation.
CostWorks' database of detailed line-items is a very resourceful asset when it comes to finding a very specific line-item. Sometimes, when using Success or MII, I will have CostWorks open on the other screen so I can find an item that the other softwares just don't have and build it into the other software from the CostWorks entry.
CostWorks does a very good job of generating reports that are both well-developed and have enough detail at the summary level to be able to sit with a client or a project manager and have them follow along and understand without being overwhelmed with detail and numbers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
CostWorks is a unique software for estimating as compared to the other softwares I have listed above. PACES is mostly used for federal modeling and really cannot be compared to Costworks. It has its own developed modeling database and has its own quirkiness and issues. MII has been developed for the USACE and utilized a user-developed folder structure and RS Means Database. I use CostWorks along side this software to find line-items that are not in the MII RS Means Database. Success has been developed for NAVFAC and again, utilizes a user-developed folder structure and RS Means Database. When I use this software, I ALWAYS have CostWorks open on the other screen as Success' RS Means database is extremely lacking when it comes to the number of detail line-items. Timberline is by SAGE and I use it mostly for DOS and FAA work. Of the 3 RS Means Database softwares, this one has the most detailed database for reference, however, there are times when I do have to look up an item that Timberline does not have and the first software I open is CostWorks.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I don't really see any "negative" impacts on my business or my ROI by purchasing CostWorks. It's a valuable tool that we use, however, some of my colleagues do not use it or use it very infrequently.
I find it well worth the cost even though we don't develop complete estimates in CostWorks due to client dictated softwares.
It has provided very quickly-built estimating models that let our team and project managers know that the RFP or the task that they are contemplating bidding on or starting to work on is actually feasible to construction given the budget and directive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info